Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
50
BATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.81
Seasonality move
:
-5.78%
Day range:
$8.86 - $9.08
52-week range:
$7.72 - $10.20
Dividend yield:
3.12%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
54.9K
Avg. volume:
50.4K
1-year change:
-11.83%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
$8.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 3.12% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$39.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 1.75% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$31.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.07% | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
$9.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 6.21% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$7.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 6.24% | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
$87.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.12% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.893 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.686 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.296 | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | 1.143 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.812 | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.796 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or COPX More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.505, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.451%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or CUT More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.20199999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or ILIT?
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or ILIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or ILIT More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or ILIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF offers a yield of 6.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or ILIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or LITP More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 6.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or PYZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or PYZ More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.366, which suggesting that the stock is 36.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.348%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.14% over the past day.
Sell
40
QMCO alert for Jan 10
Quantum [QMCO] is up 1.18% over the past day.
Sell
47
MATW alert for Jan 10
Matthews International [MATW] is down 4.03% over the past day.
