WTRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American States Water has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 18.14%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat American States Water's return on equity of 14.01%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of $83.33 which suggests that it could grow by 3.75%. Given that Essential Utilities has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe Essential Utilities is more attractive than American States Water.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.697%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than American States Water quarterly revenues of $148M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than American States Water's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while American States Water's PE ratio is 24.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.34x versus 5.00x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California Water Service Group has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 6.54%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.47%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand California Water Service Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.45%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.494%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. California Water Service Group offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group pays out 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than California Water Service Group quarterly revenues of $204M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than California Water Service Group's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while California Water Service Group's PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.34x versus 2.96x for California Water Service Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 3.34%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Global Water Resources has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.61%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.211%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Global Water Resources offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Resources pays out 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than Global Water Resources quarterly revenues of $13.3M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than Global Water Resources's net income of $443K. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while Global Water Resources's PE ratio is 43.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.34x versus 4.81x for Global Water Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Portland General Electric has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 10.78%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat Portland General Electric's return on equity of 8.35%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Portland General Electric has an analysts' consensus of $48.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Portland General Electric has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe Portland General Electric is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.832% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Portland General Electric has a beta of 0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.378%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Portland General Electric offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Portland General Electric pays out 63.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are smaller than Portland General Electric quarterly revenues of $928M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than Portland General Electric's net income of $100M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.71x while Portland General Electric's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.34x versus 1.31x for Portland General Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.