WSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five Below has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 4.24%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.53%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 6.8%. Given that Williams-Sonoma has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Williams-Sonoma is more attractive than Five Below.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.482% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M is higher than Five Below's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.90x while Five Below's PE ratio is 25.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.51x versus 1.66x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Home Depot has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 8.61%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12% beat The Home Depot's return on equity of 274.95%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand The Home Depot has an analysts' consensus of $418.64 which suggests that it could grow by 18.04%. Given that The Home Depot has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe The Home Depot is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.482% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Home Depot has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.683%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. The Home Depot offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.30 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Home Depot pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than The Home Depot quarterly revenues of $39.9B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M is lower than The Home Depot's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.90x while The Home Depot's PE ratio is 24.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.51x versus 2.16x for The Home Depot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 0.99%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12% beat RH's return on equity of --.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $258.41 which suggests that it could grow by 36.64%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.482% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.007%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than RH quarterly revenues of $814M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M is higher than RH's net income of $8M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.90x while RH's PE ratio is 45.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.51x versus 1.16x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Petco Health and Wellness has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of -0.78%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.12% beat Petco Health and Wellness's return on equity of -5.94%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Petco Health and Wellness has an analysts' consensus of $3.68 which suggests that it could grow by 48.95%. Given that Petco Health and Wellness has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Petco Health and Wellness is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.482% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Petco Health and Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Petco Health and Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Petco Health and Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Petco Health and Wellness quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $231.3M is higher than Petco Health and Wellness's net income of -$11.7M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.90x while Petco Health and Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.51x versus 0.11x for Petco Health and Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.