WSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoorDash has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 6.37%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat DoorDash's return on equity of 4.47%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand DoorDash has an analysts' consensus of $216.81 which suggests that it could grow by 3.91%. Given that Williams-Sonoma has higher upside potential than DoorDash, analysts believe Williams-Sonoma is more attractive than DoorDash.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.568, which suggesting that the stock is 56.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. DoorDash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than DoorDash quarterly revenues of $3B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than DoorDash's net income of $193M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while DoorDash's PE ratio is 267.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.69x versus 8.19x for DoorDash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 8.33%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $205.91 which suggests that it could grow by 14.82%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.568, which suggesting that the stock is 56.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.461%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.69x versus 1.09x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 13.48%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.46%.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $106.84 which suggests that it could fall by -8.35%. Given that Williams-Sonoma has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Williams-Sonoma is more attractive than Five Below.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.568, which suggesting that the stock is 56.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.113%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Five Below quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than Five Below's net income of $187.5M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while Five Below's PE ratio is 25.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.69x versus 1.66x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RH has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Williams-Sonoma's net margin of 1.71%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 52.9% beat RH's return on equity of --.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $176.83, signalling upside risk potential of 9.32%. On the other hand RH has an analysts' consensus of $260.59 which suggests that it could grow by 43.88%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma.

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.568, which suggesting that the stock is 56.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RH has a beta of 2.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.621%.

Williams-Sonoma has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. RH offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Williams-Sonoma pays 24.89% of its earnings as a dividend. RH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Williams-Sonoma quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than RH quarterly revenues of $812.4M. Williams-Sonoma's net income of $384.9M is higher than RH's net income of $13.9M. Notably, Williams-Sonoma's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.41x while RH's PE ratio is 50.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams-Sonoma is 2.69x versus 1.12x for RH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.