VIK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 6.99%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,583.99 which suggests that it could grow by 4.7%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.757%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $333M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.23x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 33.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.78x versus 7.45x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -6.69%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $188.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.65%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.39%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.23x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.78x versus 1.62x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -1.89%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 84.71%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.90 which suggests that it could grow by 33.9%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.964%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.23x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 10.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.78x versus 0.98x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -2.76%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 6.29%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.67, signalling upside risk potential of 8.47%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $16.88 which suggests that it could grow by 30.11%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.054%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $398M. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Tripadvisor's net income of -$11M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.23x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 35.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 3.78x versus 1.01x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.