UWMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mr. Cooper Group has a net margin of -33.21% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 11.75%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.38% beat Mr. Cooper Group's return on equity of 12.34%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.44, signalling upside risk potential of 59.52%. On the other hand Mr. Cooper Group has an analysts' consensus of $143.14 which suggests that it could fall by -8.22%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Mr. Cooper Group, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Mr. Cooper Group.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mr. Cooper Group has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.455%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Mr. Cooper Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Mr. Cooper Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.2M, which are smaller than Mr. Cooper Group quarterly revenues of $749M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$13.7M is lower than Mr. Cooper Group's net income of $88M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Mr. Cooper Group's PE ratio is 17.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.90x versus 3.35x for Mr. Cooper Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Onity Group has a net margin of -33.21% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 8.01%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.38% beat Onity Group's return on equity of 5.51%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.44, signalling upside risk potential of 59.52%. On the other hand Onity Group has an analysts' consensus of $49.25 which suggests that it could grow by 32.18%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Onity Group, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Onity Group.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group has a beta of 1.659, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.91%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Onity Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group pays out 1.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings's is not.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.2M, which are smaller than Onity Group quarterly revenues of $276M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$13.7M is lower than Onity Group's net income of $22.1M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Onity Group's PE ratio is 13.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.90x versus 0.28x for Onity Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of -33.21% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of -1.04%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.38% beat Rocket Companies's return on equity of 0.03%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.44, signalling upside risk potential of 59.52%. On the other hand Rocket Companies has an analysts' consensus of $14.05 which suggests that it could fall by -6.05%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Rocket Companies, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Rocket Companies.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Rocket Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.2M, which are smaller than Rocket Companies quarterly revenues of $999M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$13.7M is lower than Rocket Companies's net income of -$10.4M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Rocket Companies's PE ratio is 72.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.90x versus 3.50x for Rocket Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop has a net margin of -33.21% compared to UWM Holdings's net margin of 1.16%. UWM Holdings's return on equity of -0.38% beat Walker & Dunlop's return on equity of 5.68%.

UWM Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.44, signalling upside risk potential of 59.52%. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.63%. Given that UWM Holdings has higher upside potential than Walker & Dunlop, analysts believe UWM Holdings is more attractive than Walker & Dunlop.

UWM Holdings has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop has a beta of 1.565, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.478%.

UWM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.9%. Walker & Dunlop offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. UWM Holdings pays 275.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop pays out 81.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UWM Holdings's is not.

UWM Holdings quarterly revenues are $41.2M, which are smaller than Walker & Dunlop quarterly revenues of $237.4M. UWM Holdings's net income of -$13.7M is lower than Walker & Dunlop's net income of $2.8M. Notably, UWM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.88x while Walker & Dunlop's PE ratio is 22.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UWM Holdings is 1.90x versus 1.94x for Walker & Dunlop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.