UVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beeline Holdings has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Universal's net margin of -359.62%. Universal's return on equity of 6.45% beat Beeline Holdings's return on equity of -91.45%.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beeline Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2436.23%. Given that Beeline Holdings has higher upside potential than Universal, analysts believe Beeline Holdings is more attractive than Universal.

Universal has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beeline Holdings has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.423%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Beeline Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal pays 83.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Beeline Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $702.3M, which are larger than Beeline Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Universal's net income of $9.3M is higher than Beeline Holdings's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.51x while Beeline Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.47x versus 0.12x for Beeline Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Universal's net margin of -0.26%. Universal's return on equity of 6.45% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Universal is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Universal has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.088%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Universal pays 83.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $702.3M, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Universal's net income of $9.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.51x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 48.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.47x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sadot Group has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Universal's net margin of 0.71%. Universal's return on equity of 6.45% beat Sadot Group's return on equity of 17.3%.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sadot Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1063.06%. Given that Sadot Group has higher upside potential than Universal, analysts believe Sadot Group is more attractive than Universal.

Universal has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sadot Group has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.214%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Sadot Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal pays 83.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Sadot Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $702.3M, which are larger than Sadot Group quarterly revenues of $132.2M. Universal's net income of $9.3M is higher than Sadot Group's net income of $938K. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.51x while Sadot Group's PE ratio is 1.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.47x versus 0.01x for Sadot Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tarsier has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Universal's net margin of --. Universal's return on equity of 6.45% beat Tarsier's return on equity of --.

Universal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tarsier has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal has higher upside potential than Tarsier, analysts believe Universal is more attractive than Tarsier.

Universal has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tarsier has a beta of -7.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 840.536%.

Universal has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Tarsier offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal pays 83.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Tarsier pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal quarterly revenues are $702.3M, which are larger than Tarsier quarterly revenues of --. Universal's net income of $9.3M is higher than Tarsier's net income of --. Notably, Universal's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.51x while Tarsier's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal is 0.47x versus -- for Tarsier. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.