TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 5.83%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 20.26% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 10.14%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $153.41, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $49.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.42%. Given that Cass Information Systems has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cass Information Systems is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.725, which suggesting that the stock is 27.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.293%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 53.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $50.4M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $301M is higher than Cass Information Systems's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.30x versus 3.03x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 17.51%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 20.26% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $153.41, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $199.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.05%. Given that Cintas has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.725, which suggesting that the stock is 27.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.335, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.538%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Thomson Reuters's net income of $301M is lower than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Cintas's PE ratio is 45.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.30x versus 7.80x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviro Serv has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 20.26% beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $153.41, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.725, which suggesting that the stock is 27.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.76%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of $301M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.30x versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 17.46% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 7.07%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 20.26% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of 5.06%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $153.41, signalling upside risk potential of 1.92%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 61.64%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.725, which suggesting that the stock is 27.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.679, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.136%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 6.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 33.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $148.2M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $301M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.12x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 10.30x versus 0.46x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.