TPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 7.59%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -28.78%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $165.35 which suggests that it could grow by 20.66%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.41x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 40.72x versus 1.27x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 11.1%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -28.78%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.06 which suggests that it could grow by 34.85%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.298%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.41x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 40.72x versus 1.21x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 34.86%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -28.78%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.53%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.41x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 40.72x versus 2.56x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 61.56% compared to Texas Pacific Land's net margin of 9.52%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 40.23% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Texas Pacific Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -28.78%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Texas Pacific Land, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Texas Pacific Land.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.774% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Texas Pacific Land has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.43%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Texas Pacific Land pays 76.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Pacific Land quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Texas Pacific Land's net income of $120.7M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Texas Pacific Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.41x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Pacific Land is 40.72x versus 1.37x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.