STC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First American Financial has a net margin of 0.5% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 4.69%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 5.26% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 3.21%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $75.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.63%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.08%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than Stewart Information Services, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than Stewart Information Services.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.44%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 73.55% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 168.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Stewart Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First American Financial's is not.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $612M, which are smaller than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Stewart Information Services's net income of $3.1M is lower than First American Financial's net income of $74.2M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 36.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.67x versus 0.91x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Financial has a net margin of 0.5% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 3.1%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 5.26% beat Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 13.14%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $75.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.63%. On the other hand Fidelity National Financial has an analysts' consensus of $70.75 which suggests that it could grow by 30.03%. Given that Fidelity National Financial has higher upside potential than Stewart Information Services, analysts believe Fidelity National Financial is more attractive than Stewart Information Services.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.197%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Fidelity National Financial offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 73.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Financial pays out 41.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $612M, which are smaller than Fidelity National Financial quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Stewart Information Services's net income of $3.1M is lower than Fidelity National Financial's net income of $83M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Fidelity National Financial's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.67x versus 1.16x for Fidelity National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Investors Title has a net margin of 0.5% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 5.61%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 5.26% beat Investors Title's return on equity of 11.49%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $75.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.63%. On the other hand Investors Title has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Stewart Information Services has higher upside potential than Investors Title, analysts believe Stewart Information Services is more attractive than Investors Title.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investors Title has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.767%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Investors Title offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 73.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Investors Title pays out 96.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $612M, which are larger than Investors Title quarterly revenues of $56.6M. Stewart Information Services's net income of $3.1M is lower than Investors Title's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while Investors Title's PE ratio is 14.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.67x versus 1.68x for Investors Title. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HG Holdings has a net margin of 0.5% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of -9.13%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 5.26% beat HG Holdings's return on equity of -1.62%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $75.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.63%. On the other hand HG Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 258.8%. Given that HG Holdings has higher upside potential than Stewart Information Services, analysts believe HG Holdings is more attractive than Stewart Information Services.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.016, which suggesting that the stock is 1.593% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HG Holdings has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.428%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. HG Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 73.55% of its earnings as a dividend. HG Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stewart Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $612M, which are larger than HG Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Stewart Information Services's net income of $3.1M is higher than HG Holdings's net income of -$257K. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.15x while HG Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.67x versus 1.42x for HG Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.