SBSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Fields has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Gold Fields's return on equity of 25.25%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $7.64, signalling downside risk potential of -9.08%. On the other hand Gold Fields has an analysts' consensus of $25.40 which suggests that it could grow by 4.83%. Given that Gold Fields has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Gold Fields is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Fields has a beta of 0.530, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.97%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Fields offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Fields pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Fields quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Gold Fields's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Fields's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.97x versus 4.17x for Gold Fields. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmony Gold Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Harmony Gold Mining's return on equity of 25.77%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $7.64, signalling downside risk potential of -9.08%. On the other hand Harmony Gold Mining has an analysts' consensus of $15.84 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that Harmony Gold Mining has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Harmony Gold Mining is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmony Gold Mining has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.233%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmony Gold Mining offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining pays out 16.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harmony Gold Mining quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Harmony Gold Mining's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmony Gold Mining's PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.97x versus 2.47x for Harmony Gold Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sappi has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of -1.49%. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Sappi's return on equity of 7.35%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $7.64, signalling downside risk potential of -9.08%. On the other hand Sappi has an analysts' consensus of $1.65 which suggests that it could fall by -4.07%. Given that Sibanye Stillwater has more downside risk than Sappi, analysts believe Sappi is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sappi has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.28%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sappi offers a yield of 7.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sappi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sappi quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Sappi's net income of -$20M. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sappi's PE ratio is 5.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.97x versus 0.19x for Sappi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sasol has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Sasol's return on equity of --.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $7.64, signalling downside risk potential of -9.08%. On the other hand Sasol has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could fall by -4.18%. Given that Sibanye Stillwater has more downside risk than Sasol, analysts believe Sasol is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.506% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sasol has a beta of 0.751, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.932%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sasol offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sasol pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sasol quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Sasol's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sasol's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.97x versus 0.23x for Sasol. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.