Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
20
SBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.26
Seasonality move
:
2.08%
Day range:
$11.14 - $11.42
52-week range:
$9.06 - $14.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.81x
P/S ratio:
0.32x
P/B ratio:
1.82x
Volume:
717.2K
Avg. volume:
2.1M
1-year change:
-14.71%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$3.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.44
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$935.8M | $0.47 | 1.29% | 21.91% | $12.00 |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
$1.2B | $2.35 | 7.08% | 18.43% | $184.65 |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$344.4M | -$0.15 | -8.75% | -52.61% | -- |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$38.3M | -- | 19.89% | -- | -- |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$887.7M | -$0.03 | -17.63% | -60% | -- |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$2.5B | $4.53 | -4.47% | -16.23% | $438.31 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$11.25 | $12.00 | $1.1B | 7.81x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
$152.07 | $184.65 | $7.7B | 15.04x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.69x |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$53.13 | -- | $438.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.27x |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$7.32 | -- | $190.2M | 30.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.16x |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$31.14 | -- | $13.9B | 183.18x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.58x |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$435.31 | $438.31 | $20.2B | 17.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.84x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
60.98% | 2.433 | 71.08% | 0.34x |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
-- | 3.466 | -- | 0.72x |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
58.05% | 2.151 | 237.58% | 4.25x |
|
ELA
Envela
|
21.31% | 2.153 | 9.71% | 2.00x |
|
GME
GameStop
|
0.43% | 5.922 | 0.21% | 4.25x |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
7.9% | 2.581 | 1.15% | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
|
$479.2M | $81.8M | 9.59% | 27.33% | 8.8% | $73.3M |
|
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
|
$786.9M | $179.3M | 43.47% | 48.87% | 15.6% | $92.2M |
|
CRMT
America's Car-Mart
|
$174.1M | $25.2M | -0.32% | -0.82% | 7.25% | -$23.6M |
|
ELA
Envela
|
$11.5M | $2M | 10.11% | 13.11% | 5.03% | $1.5M |
|
GME
GameStop
|
$257.2M | -$24.8M | 2.38% | 2.41% | -2.88% | $20M |
|
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
|
$1B | $323.4M | 51.46% | 53.26% | 12.78% | -$171.1M |
Sally Beauty Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SBH or ANF?
Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 10.92%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 27.33% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 48.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.25% $0.46 $1.6B ANFAbercrombie & Fitch65.09% $2.50 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SBH or ANF?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could grow by 21.42%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Abercrombie & Fitch, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Abercrombie & Fitch.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBHSally Beauty Holdings0 3 1 ANFAbercrombie & Fitch3 5 0 -
Is SBH or ANF More Risky?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBH or ANF?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBH or ANF?
Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $935M, which are smaller than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $48.1M is lower than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $132M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 15.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.32x versus 1.69x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.32x 7.81x $935M $48.1M ANFAbercrombie & Fitch1.69x 15.04x $1.2B $132M
-
Which has Higher Returns SBH or CRMT?
America's Car-Mart has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 1.47%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 27.33% beat America's Car-Mart's return on equity of -0.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.25% $0.46 $1.6B CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart50.12% $0.61 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SBH or CRMT?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand America's Car-Mart has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.95%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than America's Car-Mart, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than America's Car-Mart.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBHSally Beauty Holdings0 3 1 CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0 3 0 -
Is SBH or CRMT More Risky?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison America's Car-Mart has a beta of 1.679, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBH or CRMT?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. America's Car-Mart offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. America's Car-Mart pays out -0.13% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBH or CRMT?
Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $935M, which are larger than America's Car-Mart quarterly revenues of $347.3M. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $48.1M is higher than America's Car-Mart's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while America's Car-Mart's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.32x versus 0.27x for America's Car-Mart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.32x 7.81x $935M $48.1M CRMTAmerica's Car-Mart0.27x -- $347.3M $5.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SBH or ELA?
Envela has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 3.59%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 27.33% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.25% $0.46 $1.6B ELAEnvela24.44% $0.06 $65M -
What do Analysts Say About SBH or ELA?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Envela.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBHSally Beauty Holdings0 3 1 ELAEnvela0 0 0 -
Is SBH or ELA More Risky?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.983%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBH or ELA?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBH or ELA?
Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $935M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $48.1M is higher than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Envela's PE ratio is 30.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.32x versus 1.16x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.32x 7.81x $935M $48.1M ELAEnvela1.16x 30.48x $46.9M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SBH or GME?
GameStop has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 2.02%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 27.33% beat GameStop's return on equity of 2.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.25% $0.46 $1.6B GMEGameStop29.9% $0.04 $4.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SBH or GME?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand GameStop has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -67.89%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than GameStop, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than GameStop.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBHSally Beauty Holdings0 3 1 GMEGameStop0 0 0 -
Is SBH or GME More Risky?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameStop has a beta of -0.099, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.872%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBH or GME?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GameStop offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GameStop pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBH or GME?
Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $935M, which are larger than GameStop quarterly revenues of $860.3M. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $48.1M is higher than GameStop's net income of $17.4M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while GameStop's PE ratio is 183.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.32x versus 2.58x for GameStop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.32x 7.81x $935M $48.1M GMEGameStop2.58x 183.18x $860.3M $17.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SBH or ULTA?
Ulta Beauty has a net margin of 5.14% compared to Sally Beauty Holdings's net margin of 9.57%. Sally Beauty Holdings's return on equity of 27.33% beat Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 53.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBHSally Beauty Holdings51.25% $0.46 $1.6B ULTAUlta Beauty39.75% $5.14 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SBH or ULTA?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.78%. On the other hand Ulta Beauty has an analysts' consensus of $438.31 which suggests that it could grow by 0.69%. Given that Sally Beauty Holdings has higher upside potential than Ulta Beauty, analysts believe Sally Beauty Holdings is more attractive than Ulta Beauty.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBHSally Beauty Holdings0 3 1 ULTAUlta Beauty10 16 2 -
Is SBH or ULTA More Risky?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a beta of 1.512, which suggesting that the stock is 51.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.496%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBH or ULTA?
Sally Beauty Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ulta Beauty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sally Beauty Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ulta Beauty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBH or ULTA?
Sally Beauty Holdings quarterly revenues are $935M, which are smaller than Ulta Beauty quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Sally Beauty Holdings's net income of $48.1M is lower than Ulta Beauty's net income of $242.2M. Notably, Sally Beauty Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.81x while Ulta Beauty's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sally Beauty Holdings is 0.32x versus 1.84x for Ulta Beauty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBHSally Beauty Holdings0.32x 7.81x $935M $48.1M ULTAUlta Beauty1.84x 17.42x $2.5B $242.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 5.45% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.71% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 1.75% over the past day.
