REXR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of -10.81%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.296, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.439%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is higher than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.21x versus 40.85x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of -15.14%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.314%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Rexford Industrial Realty's is not.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is higher than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 47.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.21x versus 2.58x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMH Properties has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of 21.37%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.77%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand UMH Properties has an analysts' consensus of $21.57 which suggests that it could grow by 15.05%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than UMH Properties.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMH Properties has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.093%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. UMH Properties offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. UMH Properties pays out 821.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are larger than UMH Properties quarterly revenues of $60.7M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is higher than UMH Properties's net income of $13M. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while UMH Properties's PE ratio is 145.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.21x versus 5.72x for UMH Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.P. Carey has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Rexford Industrial Realty's net margin of 28.11%. Rexford Industrial Realty's return on equity of 3.34% beat W.P. Carey's return on equity of 6.38%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a consensus price target of $49.50, signalling upside risk potential of 28.01%. On the other hand W.P. Carey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Rexford Industrial Realty has higher upside potential than W.P. Carey, analysts believe Rexford Industrial Realty is more attractive than W.P. Carey.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.P. Carey has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.394%.

Rexford Industrial Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. W.P. Carey offers a yield of 6.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Rexford Industrial Realty pays 132.2% of its earnings as a dividend. W.P. Carey pays out 129.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rexford Industrial Realty quarterly revenues are $241.8M, which are smaller than W.P. Carey quarterly revenues of $397.4M. Rexford Industrial Realty's net income of $67.8M is lower than W.P. Carey's net income of $111.7M. Notably, Rexford Industrial Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.44x while W.P. Carey's PE ratio is 21.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rexford Industrial Realty is 9.21x versus 7.63x for W.P. Carey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.