PRKS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Six Flags Entertainment has a net margin of -5.62% compared to United Parks & Resorts's net margin of -108.74%. United Parks & Resorts's return on equity of -- beat Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity of -25.11%.

United Parks & Resorts has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand Six Flags Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $46.43 which suggests that it could grow by 34.15%. Given that Six Flags Entertainment has higher upside potential than United Parks & Resorts, analysts believe Six Flags Entertainment is more attractive than United Parks & Resorts.

United Parks & Resorts has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 0.840, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.024%.

United Parks & Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Six Flags Entertainment offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. United Parks & Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Six Flags Entertainment pays out -14.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

United Parks & Resorts quarterly revenues are $286.9M, which are larger than Six Flags Entertainment quarterly revenues of $202.1M. United Parks & Resorts's net income of -$16.1M is higher than Six Flags Entertainment's net income of -$219.7M. Notably, United Parks & Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Six Flags Entertainment's PE ratio is 18.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Parks & Resorts is 1.56x versus 1.09x for Six Flags Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -5.62% compared to United Parks & Resorts's net margin of -48.38%. United Parks & Resorts's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -451.9%.

United Parks & Resorts has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Parks & Resorts has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe United Parks & Resorts is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

United Parks & Resorts has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United Parks & Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Parks & Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Parks & Resorts quarterly revenues are $286.9M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $6.8M. United Parks & Resorts's net income of -$16.1M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, United Parks & Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Parks & Resorts is 1.56x versus 0.81x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -5.62% compared to United Parks & Resorts's net margin of -1.76%. United Parks & Resorts's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

United Parks & Resorts has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 24.73%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $13.30 which suggests that it could grow by 43.63%. Given that Xponential Fitness has higher upside potential than United Parks & Resorts, analysts believe Xponential Fitness is more attractive than United Parks & Resorts.

United Parks & Resorts has a beta of 1.511, which suggesting that the stock is 51.141% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United Parks & Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Parks & Resorts pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -8.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

United Parks & Resorts quarterly revenues are $286.9M, which are larger than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $76.9M. United Parks & Resorts's net income of -$16.1M is lower than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, United Parks & Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Parks & Resorts is 1.56x versus 0.95x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.