PKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CAM Group has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of --. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 5.86% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than CAM Group.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -1.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.846%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Park Aerospace's net income of $993K is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.44x while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 5.01x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of 1.16%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 5.86% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.24%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.31%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.015%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $275.9M. Park Aerospace's net income of $993K is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.44x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 267.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 5.01x versus 3.46x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -8.57%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 5.86% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.81%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.517%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $204.4M. Park Aerospace's net income of $993K is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.44x while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 5.01x versus 2.74x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -658%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 5.86% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.116, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.413%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -162.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Park Aerospace's net income of $993K is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$316K. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.44x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 5.01x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.