PFGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 3.6%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 5.08%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $103.77, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.16%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than Performance Food Group, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than Performance Food Group.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.103%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $190.5M. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of $6.9M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 46.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.69x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of -0.26%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $103.77, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.226%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 46.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.07%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $103.77, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $26.90 which suggests that it could grow by 1.47%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than SpartanNash, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than SpartanNash.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.688%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is higher than SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.09x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.05%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Sysco's return on equity of 93.26%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $103.77, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $79.78 which suggests that it could grow by 6.36%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.059%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is lower than Sysco's net income of $401M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.45x while Sysco's PE ratio is 19.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.46x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.