OC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 5.54%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Owens-Corning has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Owens-Corning is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Owens-Corning's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.46x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.17x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 4.98%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Fortune Brands Innovations has an analysts' consensus of $65.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.882%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Fortune Brands Innovations offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues of $1B. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.46x while Fortune Brands Innovations's PE ratio is 16.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.17x versus 1.51x for Fortune Brands Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Griffon has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 9.28%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.31%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.46x while Griffon's PE ratio is 16.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.17x versus 1.50x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 4.53%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.80, signalling upside risk potential of 13.03%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 61.72%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.078%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.46x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 35.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.17x versus 0.56x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.