NVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Biolase has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Envista Holdings's net margin of -13.16%. Envista Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Biolase's return on equity of -21668.17%.

Envista Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.58%. On the other hand Biolase has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26566.67%. Given that Biolase has higher upside potential than Envista Holdings, analysts believe Biolase is more attractive than Envista Holdings.

Envista Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Biolase has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.737%.

Envista Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Biolase offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envista Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Biolase pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envista Holdings quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Biolase quarterly revenues of $10.9M. Envista Holdings's net income of $8.2M is higher than Biolase's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Envista Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Biolase's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envista Holdings is 1.31x versus 0.00x for Biolase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Milestone Scientific has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Envista Holdings's net margin of -58.13%. Envista Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Milestone Scientific's return on equity of -61.33%.

Envista Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.58%. On the other hand Milestone Scientific has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Milestone Scientific has higher upside potential than Envista Holdings, analysts believe Milestone Scientific is more attractive than Envista Holdings.

Envista Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Milestone Scientific has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.734%.

Envista Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Milestone Scientific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envista Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Milestone Scientific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envista Holdings quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Milestone Scientific quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Envista Holdings's net income of $8.2M is higher than Milestone Scientific's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Envista Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Milestone Scientific's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envista Holdings is 1.31x versus 7.51x for Milestone Scientific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wellness Center USA has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Envista Holdings's net margin of --. Envista Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Wellness Center USA's return on equity of --.

Envista Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.58%. On the other hand Wellness Center USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Envista Holdings has higher upside potential than Wellness Center USA, analysts believe Envista Holdings is more attractive than Wellness Center USA.

Envista Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wellness Center USA has a beta of 1.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.753%.

Envista Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wellness Center USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Envista Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wellness Center USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Envista Holdings quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Wellness Center USA quarterly revenues of --. Envista Holdings's net income of $8.2M is higher than Wellness Center USA's net income of --. Notably, Envista Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wellness Center USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envista Holdings is 1.31x versus 0.16x for Wellness Center USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dentsply Sirona has a net margin of 1.36% compared to Envista Holdings's net margin of -51.95%. Envista Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Dentsply Sirona's return on equity of -13.34%.

Envista Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.58%. On the other hand Dentsply Sirona has an analysts' consensus of $22.96 which suggests that it could grow by 21.5%. Given that Dentsply Sirona has higher upside potential than Envista Holdings, analysts believe Dentsply Sirona is more attractive than Envista Holdings.

Envista Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dentsply Sirona has a beta of 0.965, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.545%.

Envista Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dentsply Sirona offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Envista Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dentsply Sirona pays out -87.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Envista Holdings quarterly revenues are $601M, which are smaller than Dentsply Sirona quarterly revenues of $951M. Envista Holdings's net income of $8.2M is higher than Dentsply Sirona's net income of -$494M. Notably, Envista Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dentsply Sirona's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Envista Holdings is 1.31x versus 1.00x for Dentsply Sirona. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.