Where Will Hershey Stock Be In 1 Year?
Chocolate stocks used to be the epitome of sleepy stability,…
Buy
63
MSC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.24
Seasonality move
:
-12.94%
Day range:
$3.17 - $4.58
52-week range:
$2.30 - $9.30
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.35x
P/B ratio:
1.33x
Volume:
122.7K
Avg. volume:
6.9K
1-year change:
-24.24%
Market cap:
$860.9M
Revenue:
$639.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.50
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$270.8M | $0.03 | -0.49% | -72.85% | $4.23 |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$1.2B | $0.04 | 3.28% | -16.67% | $7.59 |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$4.47 | -- | $860.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.35x |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$2.63 | $4.23 | $151.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.12x |
|
MI
NFT
|
$2.18 | -- | $11M | 0.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 12.08x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$8.06 | $7.59 | $3.3B | 57.16x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.72x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
$6.26 | -- | $129.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 132.96x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
$0.34 | -- | $2.4B | 5,050.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.10x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
76.99% | 1.177 | 198.81% | 0.72x |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
29.6% | 0.716 | 53.7% | 1.25x |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -0.406 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
122.72% | 2.171 | 281.26% | 1.08x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -6.604 | -- | 9.66x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
65.52% | 1.177 | 143.99% | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$98.5M | $2.3M | -3.34% | -14.29% | 1.45% | -- |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$136.5M | -$11.5M | -2.46% | -3.14% | -3.18% | -$24.2M |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$459.1M | $158.9M | 0.97% | -- | 12.32% | -- |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -6.99% | -6.99% | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.03% | -- | -- |
Studio City International Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or BZUN?
Baozun has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of -3.06%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Baozun's return on equity of -3.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B BZUNBaozun48.09% -$0.15 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or BZUN?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.09%. On the other hand Baozun has an analysts' consensus of $4.23 which suggests that it could grow by 61.02%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Baozun.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 BZUNBaozun6 2 0 -
Is MSC or BZUN More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 112.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baozun has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.692%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or BZUN?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baozun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or BZUN?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than Baozun quarterly revenues of $283.8M. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than Baozun's net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Baozun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 1.35x versus 0.12x for Baozun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings1.35x -- $152.9M -$27.7M BZUNBaozun0.12x -- $283.8M -$8.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or MI?
NFT has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of --. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat NFT's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B MINFT-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.09%. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than NFT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 MINFT0 0 0 -
Is MSC or MI More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 112.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or MI?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NFT's PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 1.35x versus 12.08x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings1.35x -- $152.9M -$27.7M MINFT12.08x 0.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or MLCO?
Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 2.64%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment37.26% $0.08 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.09%. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $7.59 which suggests that it could fall by -5.8%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Melco Resorts and Entertainment, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Melco Resorts and Entertainment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment5 3 1 -
Is MSC or MLCO More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 112.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.541%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or MLCO?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $32.5M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 57.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 1.35x versus 0.72x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings1.35x -- $152.9M -$27.7M MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment0.72x 57.16x $1.2B $32.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or OCG?
Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of --. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B OCGOriental Culture Holding-- -- $51.1M -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or OCG?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.09%. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 OCGOriental Culture Holding0 0 0 -
Is MSC or OCG More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 112.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or OCG?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or OCG?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 1.35x versus 132.96x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings1.35x -- $152.9M -$27.7M OCGOriental Culture Holding132.96x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MSC or SJMHF?
SJM Holdings has a net margin of -18.15% compared to Studio City International Holdings's net margin of 1.44%. Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -14.29% beat SJM Holdings's return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MSCStudio City International Holdings64.43% -$0.14 $2.8B SJMHFSJM Holdings-- $0.00 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MSC or SJMHF?
Studio City International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 146.09%. On the other hand SJM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than SJM Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 SJMHFSJM Holdings0 0 0 -
Is MSC or SJMHF More Risky?
Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.125, which suggesting that the stock is 112.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSC or SJMHF?
Studio City International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJM Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Studio City International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MSC or SJMHF?
Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues are $152.9M, which are smaller than SJM Holdings quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$27.7M is lower than SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Studio City International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SJM Holdings's PE ratio is 5,050.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Studio City International Holdings is 1.35x versus 1.10x for SJM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MSCStudio City International Holdings1.35x -- $152.9M -$27.7M SJMHFSJM Holdings1.10x 5,050.00x $896.8M $12.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will KNOT Stock Be In 1 Year?
In the case of KNOT Offshore Partners (KNOP), most headlines…
Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?
Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has sharply outperformed the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 52x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Alerts
Buy
60
AEVA alert for Jul 2
Aeva Technologies [AEVA] is up 7.78% over the past day.
Sell
44
PRGS alert for Jul 2
Progress Software [PRGS] is down 2.94% over the past day.
Sell
46
NAIL alert for Jul 2
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 3.1% over the past day.
