KGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of -39.77%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 17.87% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.59%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $15.92, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.30 which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Kinross Gold's net income of $368M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.30x versus 35.27x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmont has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 37.75%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 17.87% beat Newmont's return on equity of 16.89%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $15.92, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Newmont has an analysts' consensus of $65.02 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that Newmont has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Newmont is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.038%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Newmont offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont pays out 34.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Newmont quarterly revenues of $5B. Kinross Gold's net income of $368M is lower than Newmont's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Newmont's PE ratio is 12.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.30x versus 3.29x for Newmont. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 58.68%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 17.87% beat Royal Gold's return on equity of 13.02%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $15.92, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Royal Gold has an analysts' consensus of $206.64 which suggests that it could grow by 17.76%. Given that Royal Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Royal Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Gold has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.583%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Royal Gold offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 31.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Royal Gold quarterly revenues of $193.4M. Kinross Gold's net income of $368M is higher than Royal Gold's net income of $113.5M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Royal Gold's PE ratio is 29.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.30x versus 15.11x for Royal Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 17.87% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $15.92, signalling upside risk potential of 7.04%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.58 which suggests that it could grow by 195.35%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.163%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 15.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $368M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of $7.3M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 3.30x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.