KEYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Focus Universal has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of -657.74%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Focus Universal's return on equity of -111.52%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $183.44, signalling upside risk potential of 11.78%. On the other hand Focus Universal has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Focus Universal, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Focus Universal.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Focus Universal has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.936%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Focus Universal offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Focus Universal pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Focus Universal quarterly revenues of $190.3K. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Focus Universal's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Focus Universal's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.60x versus 65.81x for Focus Universal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 10.78%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $183.44, signalling upside risk potential of 11.78%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $130.45 which suggests that it could fall by -0.61%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Itron.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.76%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Itron's PE ratio is 23.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.60x versus 2.48x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Laboratories has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of -11.45%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Mesa Laboratories's return on equity of -1.28%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $183.44, signalling upside risk potential of 11.78%. On the other hand Mesa Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $121.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Mesa Laboratories has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Mesa Laboratories is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Laboratories has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.001%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Laboratories offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Laboratories pays out -175.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Mesa Laboratories quarterly revenues of $62.1M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Mesa Laboratories's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Mesa Laboratories's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.60x versus 2.21x for Mesa Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sono-Tek has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 6.4%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Sono-Tek's return on equity of 7.48%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $183.44, signalling upside risk potential of 11.78%. On the other hand Sono-Tek has an analysts' consensus of $7.75 which suggests that it could grow by 106.67%. Given that Sono-Tek has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Sono-Tek is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sono-Tek has a beta of -0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.892%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sono-Tek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sono-Tek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sono-Tek quarterly revenues of $5.1M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Sono-Tek's net income of $327.7K. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Sono-Tek's PE ratio is 46.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.60x versus 2.88x for Sono-Tek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.