KEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ellomay Capital has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 49.49%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Ellomay Capital's return on equity of -2.88%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.01%. On the other hand Ellomay Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -33.05%. Given that Ellomay Capital has more downside risk than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Korea Electric Power is more attractive than Ellomay Capital.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.665%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Ellomay Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Ellomay Capital quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Ellomay Capital's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.59x while Ellomay Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.26x versus 4.93x for Ellomay Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enlight Renewable Energy has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 86.06%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Enlight Renewable Energy's return on equity of 8.2%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.01%. On the other hand Enlight Renewable Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.40 which suggests that it could fall by -13.04%. Given that Korea Electric Power has more downside risk than Enlight Renewable Energy, analysts believe Enlight Renewable Energy is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enlight Renewable Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Enlight Renewable Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Enlight Renewable Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Enlight Renewable Energy quarterly revenues of $109.8M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Enlight Renewable Energy's net income of $94.5M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.59x while Enlight Renewable Energy's PE ratio is 24.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.26x versus 6.99x for Enlight Renewable Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fusion Fuel Green PLC has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of --. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Fusion Fuel Green PLC's return on equity of --.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.01%. On the other hand Fusion Fuel Green PLC has an analysts' consensus of $2.55 which suggests that it could grow by 1211.73%. Given that Fusion Fuel Green PLC has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Fusion Fuel Green PLC is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fusion Fuel Green PLC has a beta of 1.939, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.942%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Fusion Fuel Green PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Fusion Fuel Green PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Fusion Fuel Green PLC quarterly revenues of --. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Fusion Fuel Green PLC's net income of -$3M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.59x while Fusion Fuel Green PLC's PE ratio is 3.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.26x versus -- for Fusion Fuel Green PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of -21.4%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.01%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $296.44 which suggests that it could grow by 2.93%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.59x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 29.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.26x versus 7.30x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.