Financhill
Sell
46

IHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.05
Seasonality move :
-25.36%
Day range:
$5.93 - $6.16
52-week range:
$2.44 - $6.43
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.17x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
749K
Avg. volume:
897.1K
1-year change:
102.68%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.14

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IHS
IHS Holding
$417.9M -- -4.19% -- $8.46
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
$2.4B $0.22 4.15% 269.1% $12.91
FXTGY
Foxtons Group PLC
-- -- -- -- --
HWGLF
Harworth Group PLC
-- -- -- -- --
MRNO
Murano Global Investments PLC
-- -- -- -- --
SVLPF
Savills PLC
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IHS
IHS Holding
$6.04 $8.46 $2B -- $0.00 0% 1.17x
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
$11.62 $12.91 $2.7B 16.84x $0.00 0% 0.28x
FXTGY
Foxtons Group PLC
$1.56 -- $235.1M 13.62x $0.03 1.99% 1.16x
HWGLF
Harworth Group PLC
$2.07 -- $671M 9.38x $0.01 1.03% 2.96x
MRNO
Murano Global Investments PLC
$8.54 -- $677.4M -- $0.00 0% 17.30x
SVLPF
Savills PLC
$13.31 -- $1.8B 28.01x $0.30 2.1% 0.63x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IHS
IHS Holding
111.63% -0.904 176.33% 1.18x
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
62.96% 2.458 127.7% 1.07x
FXTGY
Foxtons Group PLC
11.47% -4.464 9.15% 0.89x
HWGLF
Harworth Group PLC
19.18% -1.723 27.43% 1.32x
MRNO
Murano Global Investments PLC
54.8% 1.704 56.37% 0.07x
SVLPF
Savills PLC
32.54% -0.555 22.46% 1.17x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IHS
IHS Holding
$225.9M $152.1M -1.42% -10278.22% 40.08% $143.7M
CWK
Cushman & Wakefield PLC
$384.3M $51.8M 3.38% 9.53% 2.51% -$166.6M
FXTGY
Foxtons Group PLC
-- -- 9.65% 10.7% -- --
HWGLF
Harworth Group PLC
-- -- 7.55% 8.75% -- --
MRNO
Murano Global Investments PLC
$6.1M -$9.8M -5.39% -10.41% -497.97% -$36.9M
SVLPF
Savills PLC
-- -- 4.75% 7.11% -- --

IHS Holding vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IHS or CWK?

    Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a net margin of 7.53% compared to IHS Holding's net margin of 0.08%. IHS Holding's return on equity of -10278.22% beat Cushman & Wakefield PLC's return on equity of 9.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    51.39% $0.10 $3.2B
    CWK
    Cushman & Wakefield PLC
    16.82% $0.01 $4.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About IHS or CWK?

    IHS Holding has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling upside risk potential of 40.02%. On the other hand Cushman & Wakefield PLC has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that IHS Holding has higher upside potential than Cushman & Wakefield PLC, analysts believe IHS Holding is more attractive than Cushman & Wakefield PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    4 1 0
    CWK
    Cushman & Wakefield PLC
    1 5 0
  • Is IHS or CWK More Risky?

    IHS Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cushman & Wakefield PLC has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.916%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or CWK?

    IHS Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cushman & Wakefield PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IHS Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cushman & Wakefield PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or CWK?

    IHS Holding quarterly revenues are $439.6M, which are smaller than Cushman & Wakefield PLC quarterly revenues of $2.3B. IHS Holding's net income of $33.1M is higher than Cushman & Wakefield PLC's net income of $1.9M. Notably, IHS Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cushman & Wakefield PLC's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding is 1.17x versus 0.28x for Cushman & Wakefield PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    1.17x -- $439.6M $33.1M
    CWK
    Cushman & Wakefield PLC
    0.28x 16.84x $2.3B $1.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns IHS or FXTGY?

    Foxtons Group PLC has a net margin of 7.53% compared to IHS Holding's net margin of --. IHS Holding's return on equity of -10278.22% beat Foxtons Group PLC's return on equity of 10.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    51.39% $0.10 $3.2B
    FXTGY
    Foxtons Group PLC
    -- -- $197M
  • What do Analysts Say About IHS or FXTGY?

    IHS Holding has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling upside risk potential of 40.02%. On the other hand Foxtons Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding has higher upside potential than Foxtons Group PLC, analysts believe IHS Holding is more attractive than Foxtons Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    4 1 0
    FXTGY
    Foxtons Group PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is IHS or FXTGY More Risky?

    IHS Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxtons Group PLC has a beta of -0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.109%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or FXTGY?

    IHS Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foxtons Group PLC offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. IHS Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foxtons Group PLC pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxtons Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or FXTGY?

    IHS Holding quarterly revenues are $439.6M, which are larger than Foxtons Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding's net income of $33.1M is higher than Foxtons Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foxtons Group PLC's PE ratio is 13.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding is 1.17x versus 1.16x for Foxtons Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    1.17x -- $439.6M $33.1M
    FXTGY
    Foxtons Group PLC
    1.16x 13.62x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IHS or HWGLF?

    Harworth Group PLC has a net margin of 7.53% compared to IHS Holding's net margin of --. IHS Holding's return on equity of -10278.22% beat Harworth Group PLC's return on equity of 8.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    51.39% $0.10 $3.2B
    HWGLF
    Harworth Group PLC
    -- -- $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About IHS or HWGLF?

    IHS Holding has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling upside risk potential of 40.02%. On the other hand Harworth Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding has higher upside potential than Harworth Group PLC, analysts believe IHS Holding is more attractive than Harworth Group PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    4 1 0
    HWGLF
    Harworth Group PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is IHS or HWGLF More Risky?

    IHS Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harworth Group PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or HWGLF?

    IHS Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harworth Group PLC offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. IHS Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group PLC pays out 8.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or HWGLF?

    IHS Holding quarterly revenues are $439.6M, which are larger than Harworth Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding's net income of $33.1M is higher than Harworth Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harworth Group PLC's PE ratio is 9.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding is 1.17x versus 2.96x for Harworth Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    1.17x -- $439.6M $33.1M
    HWGLF
    Harworth Group PLC
    2.96x 9.38x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IHS or MRNO?

    Murano Global Investments PLC has a net margin of 7.53% compared to IHS Holding's net margin of -587%. IHS Holding's return on equity of -10278.22% beat Murano Global Investments PLC's return on equity of -10.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    51.39% $0.10 $3.2B
    MRNO
    Murano Global Investments PLC
    66.02% -$0.69 $810.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About IHS or MRNO?

    IHS Holding has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling upside risk potential of 40.02%. On the other hand Murano Global Investments PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding has higher upside potential than Murano Global Investments PLC, analysts believe IHS Holding is more attractive than Murano Global Investments PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    4 1 0
    MRNO
    Murano Global Investments PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is IHS or MRNO More Risky?

    IHS Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murano Global Investments PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or MRNO?

    IHS Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Murano Global Investments PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IHS Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Murano Global Investments PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or MRNO?

    IHS Holding quarterly revenues are $439.6M, which are larger than Murano Global Investments PLC quarterly revenues of $9.3M. IHS Holding's net income of $33.1M is higher than Murano Global Investments PLC's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, IHS Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Murano Global Investments PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding is 1.17x versus 17.30x for Murano Global Investments PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    1.17x -- $439.6M $33.1M
    MRNO
    Murano Global Investments PLC
    17.30x -- $9.3M -$54.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns IHS or SVLPF?

    Savills PLC has a net margin of 7.53% compared to IHS Holding's net margin of --. IHS Holding's return on equity of -10278.22% beat Savills PLC's return on equity of 7.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    51.39% $0.10 $3.2B
    SVLPF
    Savills PLC
    -- -- $1.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About IHS or SVLPF?

    IHS Holding has a consensus price target of $8.46, signalling upside risk potential of 40.02%. On the other hand Savills PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding has higher upside potential than Savills PLC, analysts believe IHS Holding is more attractive than Savills PLC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    4 1 0
    SVLPF
    Savills PLC
    0 0 0
  • Is IHS or SVLPF More Risky?

    IHS Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Savills PLC has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.301%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or SVLPF?

    IHS Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Savills PLC offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. IHS Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Savills PLC pays out 63.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Savills PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or SVLPF?

    IHS Holding quarterly revenues are $439.6M, which are larger than Savills PLC quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding's net income of $33.1M is higher than Savills PLC's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Savills PLC's PE ratio is 28.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding is 1.17x versus 0.63x for Savills PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IHS
    IHS Holding
    1.17x -- $439.6M $33.1M
    SVLPF
    Savills PLC
    0.63x 28.01x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?
Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?

At roughly $89 a share, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) trades for barely…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
55
INKT alert for Jul 15

MiNK Therapeutics [INKT] is down 36.03% over the past day.

Sell
48
NEGG alert for Jul 15

Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is down 26.42% over the past day.

Buy
77
VBTX alert for Jul 15

Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is up 19.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock