GSBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 89.74% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 24.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.64%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs BDC has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.85%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.98%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC's is not.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $35.2M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.78x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 19.12x versus 2.57x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 89.74% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 31.46%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 12.29%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.64%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $585.58 which suggests that it could fall by -4.92%. Given that Goldman Sachs BDC has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.124%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.98%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC's is not.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $35.2M, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $15.1B. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.78x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 19.12x versus 3.74x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JPMorgan Chase & has a net margin of 89.74% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 32.31%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28% beat JPMorgan Chase &'s return on equity of 17.36%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.64%. On the other hand JPMorgan Chase & has an analysts' consensus of $260.23 which suggests that it could fall by -2.71%. Given that Goldman Sachs BDC has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Chase &, analysts believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more attractive than JPMorgan Chase &.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Chase & has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.162%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.98%. JPMorgan Chase & offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Chase & pays out 25.28% of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Chase &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Goldman Sachs BDC's is not.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $35.2M, which are smaller than JPMorgan Chase & quarterly revenues of $45.3B. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M is lower than JPMorgan Chase &'s net income of $14.6B. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.78x while JPMorgan Chase &'s PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 19.12x versus 4.42x for JPMorgan Chase &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 89.74% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC's net margin of 90.38%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $11.33, signalling upside risk potential of 1.64%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.91 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.40500000000001%.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.98%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Goldman Sachs BDC pays 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues are $35.2M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Goldman Sachs BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.78x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs BDC is 19.12x versus 9.05x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.