GEO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ameriguard Security Services has a net margin of 3.24% compared to The GEO Group's net margin of -20.05%. The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19% beat Ameriguard Security Services's return on equity of --.

The GEO Group has a consensus price target of $41.80, signalling upside risk potential of 70.68%. On the other hand Ameriguard Security Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than Ameriguard Security Services, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than Ameriguard Security Services.

The GEO Group has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 29.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ameriguard Security Services has a beta of -4.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 581.782%.

The GEO Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ameriguard Security Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The GEO Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameriguard Security Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The GEO Group quarterly revenues are $604.6M, which are larger than Ameriguard Security Services quarterly revenues of $7.2M. The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M is higher than Ameriguard Security Services's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, The GEO Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.89x while Ameriguard Security Services's PE ratio is 757.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The GEO Group is 1.39x versus 0.64x for Ameriguard Security Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brady has a net margin of 3.24% compared to The GEO Group's net margin of 13.66%. The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19% beat Brady's return on equity of 17.76%.

The GEO Group has a consensus price target of $41.80, signalling upside risk potential of 70.68%. On the other hand Brady has an analysts' consensus of $87.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.05%. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than Brady, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than Brady.

The GEO Group has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 29.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brady has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.842%.

The GEO Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brady offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. The GEO Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brady pays out 22.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Brady's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The GEO Group quarterly revenues are $604.6M, which are larger than Brady quarterly revenues of $382.6M. The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M is lower than Brady's net income of $52.3M. Notably, The GEO Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.89x while Brady's PE ratio is 17.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The GEO Group is 1.39x versus 2.28x for Brady. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Digital Solutions has a net margin of 3.24% compared to The GEO Group's net margin of --. The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19% beat Global Digital Solutions's return on equity of --.

The GEO Group has a consensus price target of $41.80, signalling upside risk potential of 70.68%. On the other hand Global Digital Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than Global Digital Solutions, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than Global Digital Solutions.

The GEO Group has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 29.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Digital Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The GEO Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Digital Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The GEO Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Digital Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The GEO Group quarterly revenues are $604.6M, which are larger than Global Digital Solutions quarterly revenues of --. The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M is higher than Global Digital Solutions's net income of --. Notably, The GEO Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.89x while Global Digital Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The GEO Group is 1.39x versus 0.33x for Global Digital Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSA Safety has a net margin of 3.24% compared to The GEO Group's net margin of 14.15%. The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19% beat MSA Safety's return on equity of 26.24%.

The GEO Group has a consensus price target of $41.80, signalling upside risk potential of 70.68%. On the other hand MSA Safety has an analysts' consensus of $179.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.47%. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than MSA Safety, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than MSA Safety.

The GEO Group has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 29.025% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSA Safety has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

The GEO Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSA Safety offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. The GEO Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSA Safety pays out 27.64% of its earnings as a dividend. MSA Safety's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The GEO Group quarterly revenues are $604.6M, which are larger than MSA Safety quarterly revenues of $421.3M. The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M is lower than MSA Safety's net income of $59.6M. Notably, The GEO Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.89x while MSA Safety's PE ratio is 23.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The GEO Group is 1.39x versus 3.73x for MSA Safety. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.