FTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First National Energy has a net margin of 15.58% compared to Fortis's net margin of --. Fortis's return on equity of 6.84% beat First National Energy's return on equity of --.

Fortis has a consensus price target of $45.60, signalling downside risk potential of -5.99%. On the other hand First National Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis has higher upside potential than First National Energy, analysts believe Fortis is more attractive than First National Energy.

Fortis has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First National Energy has a beta of -9.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1034.459%.

Fortis has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. First National Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis pays 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. First National Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than First National Energy quarterly revenues of --. Fortis's net income of $361.6M is higher than First National Energy's net income of --. Notably, Fortis's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.46x while First National Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis is 2.87x versus -- for First National Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PowerTap Hydrogen Capital has a net margin of 15.58% compared to Fortis's net margin of --. Fortis's return on equity of 6.84% beat PowerTap Hydrogen Capital's return on equity of --.

Fortis has a consensus price target of $45.60, signalling downside risk potential of -5.99%. On the other hand PowerTap Hydrogen Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortis has higher upside potential than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital, analysts believe Fortis is more attractive than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital.

Fortis has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PowerTap Hydrogen Capital has a beta of 5.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 429.415%.

Fortis has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. PowerTap Hydrogen Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis pays 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. PowerTap Hydrogen Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital quarterly revenues of --. Fortis's net income of $361.6M is higher than PowerTap Hydrogen Capital's net income of -$947.4K. Notably, Fortis's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.46x while PowerTap Hydrogen Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis is 2.87x versus -- for PowerTap Hydrogen Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Portland General Electric has a net margin of 15.58% compared to Fortis's net margin of 10.78%. Fortis's return on equity of 6.84% beat Portland General Electric's return on equity of 8.35%.

Fortis has a consensus price target of $45.60, signalling downside risk potential of -5.99%. On the other hand Portland General Electric has an analysts' consensus of $48.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Portland General Electric has higher upside potential than Fortis, analysts believe Portland General Electric is more attractive than Fortis.

Fortis has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Portland General Electric has a beta of 0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.378%.

Fortis has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Portland General Electric offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Fortis pays 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Portland General Electric pays out 63.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Portland General Electric quarterly revenues of $928M. Fortis's net income of $361.6M is higher than Portland General Electric's net income of $100M. Notably, Fortis's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.46x while Portland General Electric's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis is 2.87x versus 1.31x for Portland General Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 15.58% compared to Fortis's net margin of 16.8%. Fortis's return on equity of 6.84% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Fortis has a consensus price target of $45.60, signalling downside risk potential of -5.99%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $256.29 which suggests that it could grow by 10.8%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Fortis, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Fortis.

Fortis has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortis has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortis pays 48.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortis quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Fortis's net income of $361.6M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Fortis's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.46x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortis is 2.87x versus 6.19x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.