EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BP PLC has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 1.47%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat BP PLC's return on equity of -1.47%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $24.39, signalling downside risk potential of -12.12%. On the other hand BP PLC has an analysts' consensus of $33.81 which suggests that it could grow by 6.6%. Given that BP PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe BP PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BP PLC has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.961%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. BP PLC offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. BP PLC pays out 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP PLC's is not.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than BP PLC quarterly revenues of $46.9B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is higher than BP PLC's net income of $687M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.78x while BP PLC's PE ratio is 341.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.72x versus 0.46x for BP PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPC has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 3.61%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat RPC's return on equity of 7.14%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $24.39, signalling downside risk potential of -12.12%. On the other hand RPC has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could grow by 23.27%. Given that RPC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe RPC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPC has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.303%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. RPC offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. RPC pays out 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are larger than RPC quarterly revenues of $332.9M. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is higher than RPC's net income of $12M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.78x while RPC's PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.72x versus 0.79x for RPC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 6.9%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 7.3%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $24.39, signalling downside risk potential of -12.12%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $77.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.85%. Given that Shell PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Shell PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.199%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $69.2B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $4.8B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.78x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 16.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.72x versus 0.82x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 8.04%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 11.56%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $24.39, signalling downside risk potential of -12.12%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $68.26 which suggests that it could grow by 7.52%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.52%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 48.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.9B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.78x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 10.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.72x versus 0.77x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.