EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BP PLC has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 1.47%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat BP PLC's return on equity of -1.47%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.83%. On the other hand BP PLC has an analysts' consensus of $33.81 which suggests that it could grow by 16.19%. Given that BP PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe BP PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BP PLC has a beta of 0.517, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.326%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. BP PLC offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. BP PLC pays out 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP PLC's is not.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than BP PLC quarterly revenues of $46.9B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is higher than BP PLC's net income of $687M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while BP PLC's PE ratio is 341.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.42x for BP PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 6.9%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 7.3%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.83%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $77.51 which suggests that it could grow by 17.05%. Given that Shell PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Shell PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.383, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.743%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $69.2B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $4.8B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 15.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.75x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 8.04%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 11.56%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.83%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $67.73 which suggests that it could grow by 15.42%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.162%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 48.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.9B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 9.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 0.71x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 8.94% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 9.52%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.36% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $25.33, signalling upside risk potential of 7.83%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 20.87%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.05%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Equinor ASA pays 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $29.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.6B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.61x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.