ENS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 10.94%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 9.46%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 17.54%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $135.05 which suggests that it could grow by 6.39%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Emerson Electric, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Emerson Electric.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.908%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.4B. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $485M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 30.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.00x versus 4.12x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flux Power Holdings has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -11.58%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Flux Power Holdings's return on equity of -490.96%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 17.54%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could grow by 222.79%. Given that Flux Power Holdings has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe Flux Power Holdings is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings has a beta of 1.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.245%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Flux Power Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings quarterly revenues of $16.7M. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than Flux Power Holdings's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Flux Power Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.00x versus 0.42x for Flux Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of -71.96%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -99.1%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 17.54%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than EnerSys.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of -0.242, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.249%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $2M. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than NeoVolta's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.00x versus 23.52x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 9.9% compared to EnerSys's net margin of 4.04%. EnerSys's return on equity of 19.82% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.67%.

EnerSys has a consensus price target of $105.36, signalling upside risk potential of 17.54%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $162.82 which suggests that it could grow by 13.11%. Given that EnerSys has higher upside potential than Regal Rexnord, analysts believe EnerSys is more attractive than Regal Rexnord.

EnerSys has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.283%.

EnerSys has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.05%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. EnerSys pays 10.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

EnerSys quarterly revenues are $974.8M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.4B. EnerSys's net income of $96.5M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $57.3M. Notably, EnerSys's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.95x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 41.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EnerSys is 1.00x versus 1.62x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.