ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 4.27% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of -8.6%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 37.52% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.63, signalling upside risk potential of 29.82%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.29%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.629% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.609%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.9M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 21.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.58x versus 0.50x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 4.27% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 16.54%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 37.52% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.63, signalling upside risk potential of 29.82%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.42%. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.629% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.123%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energizer Holdings's is not.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.9M, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.58x versus 2.04x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 4.27% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of -82.25%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 37.52% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.63, signalling upside risk potential of 29.82%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7499915%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.629% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.437%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.9M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.58x versus 0.06x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insteel Industries has a net margin of 4.27% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 6.37%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 37.52% beat Insteel Industries's return on equity of 6.59%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.63, signalling upside risk potential of 29.82%. On the other hand Insteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than Insteel Industries, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than Insteel Industries.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.629% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.773%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.26%. Insteel Industries offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries pays out 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.9M, which are larger than Insteel Industries quarterly revenues of $160.7M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Insteel Industries's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Insteel Industries's PE ratio is 30.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.58x versus 1.22x for Insteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.