CIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dynex Capital has a net margin of 89.8% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 78.07%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 13.5% beat Dynex Capital's return on equity of 9.03%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.34%. On the other hand Dynex Capital has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.21%. Given that Chimera Investment has higher upside potential than Dynex Capital, analysts believe Chimera Investment is more attractive than Dynex Capital.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynex Capital has a beta of 1.317, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.707%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.6%. Dynex Capital offers a yield of 12.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Chimera Investment pays 198.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynex Capital pays out -1517.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $152M, which are larger than Dynex Capital quarterly revenues of $39.7M. Chimera Investment's net income of $136.5M is higher than Dynex Capital's net income of $31M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.33x while Dynex Capital's PE ratio is 10.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 2.77x versus 6.66x for Dynex Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of 89.8% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of -5.67%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 13.5% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -40.82%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.34%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.13%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Chimera Investment, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Chimera Investment.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.6%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chimera Investment pays 198.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $152M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Chimera Investment's net income of $136.5M is higher than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$78M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.33x while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 2.77x versus 0.23x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orchid Island Capital has a net margin of 89.8% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 80.23%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 13.5% beat Orchid Island Capital's return on equity of 11.26%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.34%. On the other hand Orchid Island Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that Orchid Island Capital has higher upside potential than Chimera Investment, analysts believe Orchid Island Capital is more attractive than Chimera Investment.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orchid Island Capital has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.424%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.6%. Orchid Island Capital offers a yield of 18.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Chimera Investment pays 198.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Orchid Island Capital pays out -205.87% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $152M, which are larger than Orchid Island Capital quarterly revenues of $21.6M. Chimera Investment's net income of $136.5M is higher than Orchid Island Capital's net income of $17.3M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.33x while Orchid Island Capital's PE ratio is 7.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 2.77x versus 6.08x for Orchid Island Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Redfin has a net margin of 89.8% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of -12.15%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 13.5% beat Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.34%. On the other hand Redfin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Chimera Investment has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Chimera Investment is more attractive than Redfin.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.710, which suggesting that the stock is 70.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Redfin has a beta of 2.629, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.89%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.6%. Redfin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chimera Investment pays 198.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Redfin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $152M, which are smaller than Redfin quarterly revenues of $278M. Chimera Investment's net income of $136.5M is higher than Redfin's net income of -$33.8M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.33x while Redfin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 2.77x versus 0.98x for Redfin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.