CHH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of 13.38% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 1.16%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 21.12%.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $132.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.81%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $145.72 which suggests that it could grow by 0.23%. Given that Choice Hotels International has higher upside potential than Hyatt Hotels, analysts believe Choice Hotels International is more attractive than Hyatt Hotels.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.058%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 4.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $44.5M is higher than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $20M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 18.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.91x versus 2.20x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 13.38% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of -1.48%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hilton Grand Vacations's return on equity of 1.73%.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $132.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.81%. On the other hand Hilton Grand Vacations has an analysts' consensus of $48.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.31%. Given that Hilton Grand Vacations has higher upside potential than Choice Hotels International, analysts believe Hilton Grand Vacations is more attractive than Choice Hotels International.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.513%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Hilton Grand Vacations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Grand Vacations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Choice Hotels International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Hilton Grand Vacations quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $44.5M is higher than Hilton Grand Vacations's net income of -$17M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Hilton Grand Vacations's PE ratio is 138.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.91x versus 0.90x for Hilton Grand Vacations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a net margin of 13.38% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 11.13%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of --.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $132.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.81%. On the other hand Hilton Worldwide Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $250.20 which suggests that it could fall by -7.37%. Given that Choice Hotels International has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Choice Hotels International is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.679%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays out 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $44.5M is lower than Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Hilton Worldwide Holdings's PE ratio is 42.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.91x versus 5.91x for Hilton Worldwide Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 13.38% compared to Choice Hotels International's net margin of 10.62%. Choice Hotels International's return on equity of 5278.63% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

Choice Hotels International has a consensus price target of $132.88, signalling upside risk potential of 1.81%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $273.71 which suggests that it could fall by -1.38%. Given that Choice Hotels International has higher upside potential than Marriott International, analysts believe Choice Hotels International is more attractive than Marriott International.

Choice Hotels International has a beta of 0.961, which suggesting that the stock is 3.856% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.04%.

Choice Hotels International has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Choice Hotels International pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Choice Hotels International quarterly revenues are $332.9M, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Choice Hotels International's net income of $44.5M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $665M. Notably, Choice Hotels International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.93x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 31.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Choice Hotels International is 3.91x versus 3.09x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.