CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of 4.26%. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.18%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 78.57%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.524, which suggesting that the stock is 47.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.396%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $167.1M. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 1.90x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Telecom has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat China Telecom's return on equity of --.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.18%. On the other hand China Telecom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango has higher upside potential than China Telecom, analysts believe Cango is more attractive than China Telecom.

Cango has a beta of 0.524, which suggesting that the stock is 47.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Telecom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Telecom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Telecom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than China Telecom quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is higher than China Telecom's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while China Telecom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 1.90x versus -- for China Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of 16.57%. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat H World Group's return on equity of 27.21%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.18%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.60 which suggests that it could grow by 27.44%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.524, which suggesting that the stock is 47.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.534%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $741.6M. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is lower than H World Group's net income of $122.9M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while H World Group's PE ratio is 23.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 1.90x versus 3.38x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of -10.53%. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat Uxin's return on equity of --.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.18%. On the other hand Uxin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1046.72%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.524, which suggesting that the stock is 47.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin has a beta of 1.313, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.342%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than Uxin quarterly revenues of $69.3M. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is lower than Uxin's net income of -$7.3M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Uxin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 1.90x versus 3.11x for Uxin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.