BXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 2.14% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 4.68%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.34%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.15%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.95%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than Distribution Solutions Group, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than Distribution Solutions Group.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.904%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $747.3M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $468M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M is lower than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.19x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,763.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.31x versus 0.96x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 2.14% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 4.46%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.15%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.99%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.494%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $747.3M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M is lower than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.19x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 21.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.31x versus 0.81x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 2.14% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 7.32%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 20.14%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.15%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.75%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $747.3M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $979.4M. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $71.7M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.19x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.31x versus 1.13x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 2.14% compared to BlueLinx Holdings's net margin of 1.09%. BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 4.61% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 5.91%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.15%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.65%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than Resideo Technologies, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than Resideo Technologies.

BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.722%.

BlueLinx Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlueLinx Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues are $747.3M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.8B. BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $16M is lower than Resideo Technologies's net income of $20M. Notably, BlueLinx Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.19x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 21.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlueLinx Holdings is 0.31x versus 0.56x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.