BRFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Afya has a net margin of 4.95% compared to BRF SA's net margin of 17.66%. BRF SA's return on equity of 20.3% beat Afya's return on equity of 16%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $4.99, signalling upside risk potential of 47.56%. On the other hand Afya has an analysts' consensus of $19.45 which suggests that it could fall by -0.82%. Given that BRF SA has higher upside potential than Afya, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than Afya.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Afya has a beta of 0.599, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.14%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Afya offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Afya pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Afya quarterly revenues of $145.3M. BRF SA's net income of $148.6M is higher than Afya's net income of $25.7M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Afya's PE ratio is 15.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.49x versus 2.95x for Afya. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 4.95% compared to BRF SA's net margin of -0.04%. BRF SA's return on equity of 20.3% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $4.99, signalling upside risk potential of 47.56%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.66%. Given that BRF SA has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.223%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. BRF SA's net income of $148.6M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.49x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of 4.95% compared to BRF SA's net margin of 2.13%. BRF SA's return on equity of 20.3% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $4.99, signalling upside risk potential of 47.56%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $17.14 which suggests that it could grow by 37.42%. Given that BRF SA has higher upside potential than Utz Brands, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than Utz Brands.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.322%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $352.1M. BRF SA's net income of $148.6M is higher than Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 38.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.49x versus 0.75x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vasta Platform has a net margin of 4.95% compared to BRF SA's net margin of 86.92%. BRF SA's return on equity of 20.3% beat Vasta Platform's return on equity of 9.62%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $4.99, signalling upside risk potential of 47.56%. On the other hand Vasta Platform has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could fall by -27.51%. Given that BRF SA has higher upside potential than Vasta Platform, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than Vasta Platform.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.257% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vasta Platform has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Vasta Platform offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Vasta Platform pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Vasta Platform quarterly revenues of $119.6M. BRF SA's net income of $148.6M is higher than Vasta Platform's net income of $104M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Vasta Platform's PE ratio is 4.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.49x versus 1.11x for Vasta Platform. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.