BRFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Afya has a net margin of 7.25% compared to BRF SA's net margin of 26.91%. BRF SA's return on equity of 22.56% beat Afya's return on equity of 16.16%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.26%. On the other hand Afya has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could grow by 29.82%. Given that Afya has higher upside potential than BRF SA, analysts believe Afya is more attractive than BRF SA.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Afya has a beta of 0.580, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.967%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Afya offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Afya pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Afya quarterly revenues of $159.7M. BRF SA's net income of $191.8M is higher than Afya's net income of $43M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Afya's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.57x versus 2.37x for Afya. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas has a net margin of 7.25% compared to BRF SA's net margin of -0.64%. BRF SA's return on equity of 22.56% beat Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas's return on equity of 15.16%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.26%. On the other hand Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BRF SA has higher upside potential than Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.494%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas offers a yield of 7.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas pays out 140.63% of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas's is not.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas quarterly revenues of $29M. BRF SA's net income of $191.8M is higher than Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas's net income of -$186.4K. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.57x versus 1.68x for Brasilagro - Cia Bras de Prop Agricolas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 7.25% compared to BRF SA's net margin of -0.09%. BRF SA's return on equity of 22.56% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.26%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $25.29 which suggests that it could grow by 6.2%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than BRF SA, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than BRF SA.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.783%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.1B. BRF SA's net income of $191.8M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.57x versus 0.04x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vasta Platform has a net margin of 7.25% compared to BRF SA's net margin of -0.76%. BRF SA's return on equity of 22.56% beat Vasta Platform's return on equity of 9.17%.

BRF SA has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.26%. On the other hand Vasta Platform has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -19.35%. Given that Vasta Platform has more downside risk than BRF SA, analysts believe BRF SA is more attractive than Vasta Platform.

BRF SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 33.019% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vasta Platform has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BRF SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Vasta Platform offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRF SA pays 35.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Vasta Platform pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BRF SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRF SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vasta Platform quarterly revenues of $73.4M. BRF SA's net income of $191.8M is higher than Vasta Platform's net income of -$557.3K. Notably, BRF SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.96x while Vasta Platform's PE ratio is 4.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRF SA is 0.57x versus 1.12x for Vasta Platform. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.