BRBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of 9.98% compared to BellRing Brands's net margin of 13.42%. BellRing Brands's return on equity of -- beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

BellRing Brands has a consensus price target of $78.69, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1566.95%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than BellRing Brands, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than BellRing Brands.

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.705, which suggesting that the stock is 29.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.979%.

BellRing Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BellRing Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BellRing Brands quarterly revenues are $588M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. BellRing Brands's net income of $58.7M is higher than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, BellRing Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.34x while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BellRing Brands is 3.51x versus 0.02x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.98% compared to BellRing Brands's net margin of 11.87%. BellRing Brands's return on equity of -- beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

BellRing Brands has a consensus price target of $78.69, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.02%. Given that BellRing Brands has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe BellRing Brands is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.705, which suggesting that the stock is 29.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

BellRing Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. BellRing Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BellRing Brands quarterly revenues are $588M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. BellRing Brands's net income of $58.7M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, BellRing Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.34x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BellRing Brands is 3.51x versus 1.27x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 9.98% compared to BellRing Brands's net margin of -1.34%. BellRing Brands's return on equity of -- beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -7.4%.

BellRing Brands has a consensus price target of $78.69, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 103.76%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than BellRing Brands, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than BellRing Brands.

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.705, which suggesting that the stock is 29.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BellRing Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BellRing Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BellRing Brands quarterly revenues are $588M, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.7M. BellRing Brands's net income of $58.7M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$156.2K. Notably, BellRing Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.34x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BellRing Brands is 3.51x versus 1.44x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Simply Good Foods has a net margin of 9.98% compared to BellRing Brands's net margin of 10.22%. BellRing Brands's return on equity of -- beat The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.4%.

BellRing Brands has a consensus price target of $78.69, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand The Simply Good Foods has an analysts' consensus of $39.90 which suggests that it could grow by 23.03%. Given that BellRing Brands has higher upside potential than The Simply Good Foods, analysts believe BellRing Brands is more attractive than The Simply Good Foods.

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.705, which suggesting that the stock is 29.497% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.985%.

BellRing Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Simply Good Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BellRing Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Simply Good Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BellRing Brands quarterly revenues are $588M, which are larger than The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues of $359.7M. BellRing Brands's net income of $58.7M is higher than The Simply Good Foods's net income of $36.7M. Notably, BellRing Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.34x while The Simply Good Foods's PE ratio is 22.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BellRing Brands is 3.51x versus 2.33x for The Simply Good Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.