BHLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 34.23% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of 5.97%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 3.95% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 1.15%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Berkshire Hills Bancorp has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe Berkshire Hills Bancorp is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.289%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 45.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $109.6M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $37.5M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of $522K. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.17x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 24.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 3.46x versus 1.63x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of 34.23% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of -32.12%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 3.95% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity of -10.51%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Carver Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15731.13%. Given that Carver Bancorp has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, analysts believe Carver Bancorp is more attractive than Berkshire Hills Bancorp.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.887%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Carver Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 45.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $109.6M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $37.5M is higher than Carver Bancorp's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.17x while Carver Bancorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 3.46x versus 0.36x for Carver Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Financial has a net margin of 34.23% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of 20.85%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 3.95% beat Heritage Financial's return on equity of 4.43%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand Heritage Financial has an analysts' consensus of $29.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.53%. Given that Heritage Financial has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, analysts believe Heritage Financial is more attractive than Berkshire Hills Bancorp.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Financial has a beta of 0.556, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.379%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Heritage Financial offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 45.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Financial pays out 49.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $109.6M, which are larger than Heritage Financial quarterly revenues of $54.8M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $37.5M is higher than Heritage Financial's net income of $11.4M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.17x while Heritage Financial's PE ratio is 22.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 3.46x versus 4.06x for Heritage Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MVB Financial has a net margin of 34.23% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of 6.4%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 3.95% beat MVB Financial's return on equity of 6.39%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $33.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.76%. On the other hand MVB Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.75%. Given that MVB Financial has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, analysts believe MVB Financial is more attractive than Berkshire Hills Bancorp.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.881, which suggesting that the stock is 11.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MVB Financial has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.556%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. MVB Financial offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 45.56% of its earnings as a dividend. MVB Financial pays out 27.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $109.6M, which are larger than MVB Financial quarterly revenues of $32.5M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $37.5M is higher than MVB Financial's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.17x while MVB Financial's PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 3.46x versus 1.84x for MVB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.