ATS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LiqTech International has a net margin of -11.99% compared to ATS's net margin of -50.92%. ATS's return on equity of -1.48% beat LiqTech International's return on equity of -73.68%.

ATS has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.83%. On the other hand LiqTech International has an analysts' consensus of $3.60 which suggests that it could grow by 94.07%. Given that LiqTech International has higher upside potential than ATS, analysts believe LiqTech International is more attractive than ATS.

ATS has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiqTech International has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.884%.

ATS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiqTech International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LiqTech International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATS quarterly revenues are $399.3M, which are larger than LiqTech International quarterly revenues of $4.6M. ATS's net income of -$47.9M is lower than LiqTech International's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, ATS's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.15x while LiqTech International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATS is 1.60x versus 0.90x for LiqTech International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of -11.99% compared to ATS's net margin of 16.46%. ATS's return on equity of -1.48% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.49%.

ATS has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.83%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $248.57 which suggests that it could grow by 13.8%. Given that ATS has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe ATS is more attractive than Nordson.

ATS has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.439%.

ATS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. ATS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ATS quarterly revenues are $399.3M, which are smaller than Nordson quarterly revenues of $682.9M. ATS's net income of -$47.9M is lower than Nordson's net income of $112.4M. Notably, ATS's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.15x while Nordson's PE ratio is 28.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATS is 1.60x versus 4.64x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of -11.99% compared to ATS's net margin of 18.95%. ATS's return on equity of -1.48% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 15.37%.

ATS has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.83%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.85%. Given that ATS has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe ATS is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

ATS has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.635%.

ATS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATS quarterly revenues are $399.3M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $10.6M. ATS's net income of -$47.9M is lower than Taylor Devices's net income of $2M. Notably, ATS's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.15x while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 19.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATS is 1.60x versus 3.64x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of -11.99% compared to ATS's net margin of -14.37%. ATS's return on equity of -1.48% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

ATS has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.83%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of $1.68 which suggests that it could grow by 115.7%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than ATS, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than ATS.

ATS has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.745% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 2.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.997%.

ATS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ATS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ATS quarterly revenues are $399.3M, which are larger than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $336.2M. ATS's net income of -$47.9M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$48.3M. Notably, ATS's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.15x while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ATS is 1.60x versus 0.03x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.