AHT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Braemar Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of -20.94% compared to Ashford Hospitality Trust's net margin of 8.49%. Ashford Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -- beat Braemar Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of -0.68%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.55%. On the other hand Braemar Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could fall by -0.31%. Given that Ashford Hospitality Trust has higher upside potential than Braemar Hotels & Resorts, analysts believe Ashford Hospitality Trust is more attractive than Braemar Hotels & Resorts.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a beta of 2.382, which suggesting that the stock is 138.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Braemar Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 2.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.563%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Braemar Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Ashford Hospitality Trust pays -8.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Braemar Hotels & Resorts pays out -194.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ashford Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues are $276.6M, which are larger than Braemar Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $148.4M. Ashford Hospitality Trust's net income of -$57.9M is lower than Braemar Hotels & Resorts's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Ashford Hospitality Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Braemar Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashford Hospitality Trust is 0.05x versus 0.51x for Braemar Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netstreit has a net margin of -20.94% compared to Ashford Hospitality Trust's net margin of -14%. Ashford Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -- beat Netstreit's return on equity of -0.36%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.55%. On the other hand Netstreit has an analysts' consensus of $18.31 which suggests that it could grow by 28.58%. Given that Ashford Hospitality Trust has higher upside potential than Netstreit, analysts believe Ashford Hospitality Trust is more attractive than Netstreit.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a beta of 2.382, which suggesting that the stock is 138.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netstreit has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netstreit offers a yield of 5.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Ashford Hospitality Trust pays -8.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Netstreit pays out 761.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ashford Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues are $276.6M, which are larger than Netstreit quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Ashford Hospitality Trust's net income of -$57.9M is lower than Netstreit's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Ashford Hospitality Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netstreit's PE ratio is 233.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashford Hospitality Trust is 0.05x versus 7.26x for Netstreit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of -20.94% compared to Ashford Hospitality Trust's net margin of 8.32%. Ashford Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -- beat Park Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 8.81%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.55%. On the other hand Park Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 17.45%. Given that Ashford Hospitality Trust has higher upside potential than Park Hotels & Resorts, analysts believe Ashford Hospitality Trust is more attractive than Park Hotels & Resorts.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a beta of 2.382, which suggesting that the stock is 138.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 2.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.832%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 11.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ashford Hospitality Trust pays -8.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Park Hotels & Resorts pays out 156.7% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ashford Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues are $276.6M, which are smaller than Park Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $649M. Ashford Hospitality Trust's net income of -$57.9M is lower than Park Hotels & Resorts's net income of $54M. Notably, Ashford Hospitality Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 9.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashford Hospitality Trust is 0.05x versus 1.21x for Park Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryman Hospitality Properties has a net margin of -20.94% compared to Ashford Hospitality Trust's net margin of 10.73%. Ashford Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -- beat Ryman Hospitality Properties's return on equity of 38.57%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.55%. On the other hand Ryman Hospitality Properties has an analysts' consensus of $127.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Ashford Hospitality Trust has higher upside potential than Ryman Hospitality Properties, analysts believe Ashford Hospitality Trust is more attractive than Ryman Hospitality Properties.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a beta of 2.382, which suggesting that the stock is 138.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryman Hospitality Properties has a beta of 1.654, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.438%.

Ashford Hospitality Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryman Hospitality Properties offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Ashford Hospitality Trust pays -8.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryman Hospitality Properties pays out 56.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryman Hospitality Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashford Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues are $276.6M, which are smaller than Ryman Hospitality Properties quarterly revenues of $550M. Ashford Hospitality Trust's net income of -$57.9M is lower than Ryman Hospitality Properties's net income of $59M. Notably, Ashford Hospitality Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryman Hospitality Properties's PE ratio is 18.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashford Hospitality Trust is 0.05x versus 2.87x for Ryman Hospitality Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.