Financhill
Sell
34

UMAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$17.40
Seasonality move :
--
Day range:
$14.30 - $16.29
52-week range:
$0.98 - $23.62
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
6.30x
Volume:
3.4M
Avg. volume:
8.1M
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$121.1M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.69

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
UMAC
Unusual Machines
-- -- -- -- $14.00
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
$48.9M $0.58 42.32% -33.33% --
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- -- -- -- --
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
-- -- -- -- --
GRAF
Graf Global
-- -- -- -- --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
UMAC
Unusual Machines
$14.59 $14.00 $121.1M -- $0.00 0% --
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
$19.81 -- $734.2M 7.74x $0.07 9.74% 7.05x
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
$10.67 -- $41.8M 59.33x $0.00 0% --
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
$11.27 -- $162.7M -- $0.00 0% --
GRAF
Graf Global
$10.07 -- $289.5M 98.00x $0.00 0% --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
$11.70 -- $64.8M 1,108.00x $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
UMAC
Unusual Machines
13.5% 0.000 31.91% 0.87x
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
53.38% 0.834 125.03% 0.80x
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- 0.024 -- --
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
-- -0.066 -- --
GRAF
Graf Global
-- 0.000 -- --
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -0.011 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
UMAC
Unusual Machines
$399.5K -$1.5M -- -- -137.32% -$536.7K
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
-- -- 5.91% 12.68% 172.63% $46.9M
DMYY
dMY Squared Technology Group
-- -$287.8K -- -- -- -$21.3K
EVE
EVe Mobility Acquisition
-- -- -- -- -- --
GRAF
Graf Global
-- -$195.2K -- -- -- -$585.7K
MITA
Coliseum Acquisition
-- -$1.1M -- -- -- --

Unusual Machines vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns UMAC or CCAP?

    Crescent Capital BDC has a net margin of -140.03% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of 84.43%. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -- beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    -- $0.41 $1.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About UMAC or CCAP?

    Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.04%. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.72%. Given that Unusual Machines has more downside risk than Crescent Capital BDC, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Unusual Machines.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    0 0 0
  • Is UMAC or CCAP More Risky?

    Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMAC or CCAP?

    Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC offers a yield of 9.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC pays out 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UMAC or CCAP?

    Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $18.1M. Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crescent Capital BDC's PE ratio is 7.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is -- versus 7.05x for Crescent Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
    CCAP
    Crescent Capital BDC
    7.05x 7.74x $18.1M $15.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns UMAC or DMYY?

    dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -140.03% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of --. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    -- $0.04 --
  • What do Analysts Say About UMAC or DMYY?

    Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.04%. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    0 0 0
  • Is UMAC or DMYY More Risky?

    Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMAC or DMYY?

    Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UMAC or DMYY?

    Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are larger than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M is lower than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
    DMYY
    dMY Squared Technology Group
    -- 59.33x -- $145.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns UMAC or EVE?

    EVe Mobility Acquisition has a net margin of -140.03% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of --. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -- beat EVe Mobility Acquisition's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
    EVE
    EVe Mobility Acquisition
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UMAC or EVE?

    Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.04%. On the other hand EVe Mobility Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than EVe Mobility Acquisition, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than EVe Mobility Acquisition.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
    EVE
    EVe Mobility Acquisition
    0 0 0
  • Is UMAC or EVE More Risky?

    Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVe Mobility Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMAC or EVE?

    Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVe Mobility Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVe Mobility Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UMAC or EVE?

    Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are larger than EVe Mobility Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M is higher than EVe Mobility Acquisition's net income of --. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EVe Mobility Acquisition's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is -- versus -- for EVe Mobility Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
    EVE
    EVe Mobility Acquisition
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns UMAC or GRAF?

    Graf Global has a net margin of -140.03% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of --. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    -- $0.10 --
  • What do Analysts Say About UMAC or GRAF?

    Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.04%. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Graf Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    0 0 0
  • Is UMAC or GRAF More Risky?

    Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMAC or GRAF?

    Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UMAC or GRAF?

    Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are larger than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
    GRAF
    Graf Global
    -- 98.00x -- $2.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns UMAC or MITA?

    Coliseum Acquisition has a net margin of -140.03% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of --. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -- beat Coliseum Acquisition's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    26.09% -$0.30 $22.2M
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    -- -$0.11 --
  • What do Analysts Say About UMAC or MITA?

    Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -4.04%. On the other hand Coliseum Acquisition has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Coliseum Acquisition, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Coliseum Acquisition.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    1 0 0
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    0 0 0
  • Is UMAC or MITA More Risky?

    Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coliseum Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMAC or MITA?

    Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coliseum Acquisition offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coliseum Acquisition pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UMAC or MITA?

    Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are larger than Coliseum Acquisition quarterly revenues of --. Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Coliseum Acquisition's net income of -$694.9K. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coliseum Acquisition's PE ratio is 1,108.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is -- versus -- for Coliseum Acquisition. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UMAC
    Unusual Machines
    -- -- $1.5M -$2.1M
    MITA
    Coliseum Acquisition
    -- 1,108.00x -- -$694.9K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?

Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…

Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?

Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…

Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26

Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 6.12% over the past day.

Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.66% over the past day.

Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 0.55% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock