UMAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -159.93% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of -10.37%. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -46%.

Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.17%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.84%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.501%.

Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is 17.90x versus 4.30x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Cat Holdings has a net margin of -159.93% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of -1418.91%. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31% beat Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -154.1%.

Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.17%. On the other hand Red Cat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 29.07%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.971%.

Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Cat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Cat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $2M, which are larger than Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M is higher than Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$23.1M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Cat Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is 17.90x versus 65.44x for Red Cat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -159.93% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of -6726.52%. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -99.09%.

Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.17%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 16.16%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $2M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of $42.6M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is 17.90x versus 308.00x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -159.93% compared to Unusual Machines's net margin of -9.6%. Unusual Machines's return on equity of -187.31% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -13.01%.

Unusual Machines has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.17%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.27%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Stratasys.

Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.546%.

Unusual Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unusual Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Unusual Machines quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $136M. Unusual Machines's net income of -$3.3M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Unusual Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unusual Machines is 17.90x versus 1.41x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.