DC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Resource has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of -67.34%. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Resource's return on equity of -113.02%.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 157.94%. On the other hand Gold Resource has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 127.23%. Given that Dakota Gold has higher upside potential than Gold Resource, analysts believe Dakota Gold is more attractive than Gold Resource.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Resource has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.198%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Resource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Resource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Resource quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Dakota Gold's net income of -$3.7M is higher than Gold Resource's net income of -$8.3M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Resource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 0.91x for Gold Resource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comstock has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of -1157.26%. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Comstock's return on equity of -82.51%.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 157.94%. On the other hand Comstock has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 547.67%. Given that Comstock has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold, analysts believe Comstock is more attractive than Dakota Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.807%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comstock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Comstock quarterly revenues of $785.8K. Dakota Gold's net income of -$3.7M is higher than Comstock's net income of -$9.1M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comstock's PE ratio is 3.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 22.58x for Comstock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U.S. Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of --. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat U.S. Gold's return on equity of --.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 157.94%. On the other hand U.S. Gold has an analysts' consensus of $18.85 which suggests that it could grow by 54.76%. Given that Dakota Gold has higher upside potential than U.S. Gold, analysts believe Dakota Gold is more attractive than U.S. Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U.S. Gold has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.457%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U.S. Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U.S. Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than U.S. Gold quarterly revenues of --. Dakota Gold's net income of -$3.7M is higher than U.S. Gold's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U.S. Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 5.17x for U.S. Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vista Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Dakota Gold's net margin of --. Dakota Gold's return on equity of -- beat Vista Gold's return on equity of --.

Dakota Gold has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 157.94%. On the other hand Vista Gold has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 177.78%. Given that Vista Gold has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold, analysts believe Vista Gold is more attractive than Dakota Gold.

Dakota Gold has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vista Gold has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.335%.

Dakota Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vista Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dakota Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vista Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dakota Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vista Gold quarterly revenues of --. Dakota Gold's net income of -$3.7M is lower than Vista Gold's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Dakota Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vista Gold's PE ratio is 14.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dakota Gold is -- versus 287.37x for Vista Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.