CPHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nanoviricides has a net margin of -69.14% compared to China Pharma Holding's net margin of --. China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -61.79% beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

China Pharma Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 364.29%. Given that Nanoviricides has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holding, analysts believe Nanoviricides is more attractive than China Pharma Holding.

China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.749%.

China Pharma Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Pharma Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. China Pharma Holding's net income of -$785.6K is higher than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, China Pharma Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Pharma Holding is 0.89x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -69.14% compared to China Pharma Holding's net margin of --. China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -61.79% beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

China Pharma Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 731.11%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holding, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than China Pharma Holding.

China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.243%.

China Pharma Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Pharma Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. China Pharma Holding's net income of -$785.6K is higher than Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, China Pharma Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Pharma Holding is 0.89x versus 1.16x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -69.14% compared to China Pharma Holding's net margin of --. China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -61.79% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

China Pharma Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1519.25%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than China Pharma Holding, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than China Pharma Holding.

China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.165%.

China Pharma Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Pharma Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. China Pharma Holding's net income of -$785.6K is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, China Pharma Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Pharma Holding is 0.89x versus 0.33x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yubo International Biotech has a net margin of -69.14% compared to China Pharma Holding's net margin of -11740.4%. China Pharma Holding's return on equity of -61.79% beat Yubo International Biotech's return on equity of --.

China Pharma Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yubo International Biotech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Pharma Holding has higher upside potential than Yubo International Biotech, analysts believe China Pharma Holding is more attractive than Yubo International Biotech.

China Pharma Holding has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yubo International Biotech has a beta of 3.946, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 294.557%.

China Pharma Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yubo International Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Pharma Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yubo International Biotech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Pharma Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Yubo International Biotech quarterly revenues of $3.5K. China Pharma Holding's net income of -$785.6K is lower than Yubo International Biotech's net income of -$435.6K. Notably, China Pharma Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yubo International Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Pharma Holding is 0.89x versus 12.99x for Yubo International Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.