XWEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fonar has a net margin of -67.19% compared to XWELL's net margin of 9.23%. XWELL's return on equity of -153.74% beat Fonar's return on equity of 5.33%.

XWELL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 686.52%. On the other hand Fonar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XWELL has higher upside potential than Fonar, analysts believe XWELL is more attractive than Fonar.

XWELL has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fonar has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.30600000000001%.

XWELL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fonar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XWELL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fonar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XWELL quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Fonar quarterly revenues of $27.2M. XWELL's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Fonar's net income of $2.5M. Notably, XWELL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fonar's PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XWELL is 0.13x versus 0.89x for Fonar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OncoCyte has a net margin of -67.19% compared to XWELL's net margin of -312.02%. XWELL's return on equity of -153.74% beat OncoCyte's return on equity of -693.81%.

XWELL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 686.52%. On the other hand OncoCyte has an analysts' consensus of $5.42 which suggests that it could grow by 66.16%. Given that XWELL has higher upside potential than OncoCyte, analysts believe XWELL is more attractive than OncoCyte.

XWELL has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OncoCyte has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.749%.

XWELL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OncoCyte offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XWELL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OncoCyte pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XWELL quarterly revenues are $7M, which are larger than OncoCyte quarterly revenues of $2.1M. XWELL's net income of -$4.7M is higher than OncoCyte's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, XWELL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OncoCyte's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XWELL is 0.13x versus 14.78x for OncoCyte. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProPhase Labs has a net margin of -67.19% compared to XWELL's net margin of -209.38%. XWELL's return on equity of -153.74% beat ProPhase Labs's return on equity of -144.22%.

XWELL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 686.52%. On the other hand ProPhase Labs has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 3680.82%. Given that ProPhase Labs has higher upside potential than XWELL, analysts believe ProPhase Labs is more attractive than XWELL.

XWELL has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProPhase Labs has a beta of -0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.175%.

XWELL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProPhase Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XWELL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProPhase Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XWELL quarterly revenues are $7M, which are larger than ProPhase Labs quarterly revenues of $1.4M. XWELL's net income of -$4.7M is lower than ProPhase Labs's net income of $4M. Notably, XWELL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProPhase Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XWELL is 0.13x versus 1.98x for ProPhase Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veracyte has a net margin of -67.19% compared to XWELL's net margin of 6.16%. XWELL's return on equity of -153.74% beat Veracyte's return on equity of 2.85%.

XWELL has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 686.52%. On the other hand Veracyte has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50.22%. Given that XWELL has higher upside potential than Veracyte, analysts believe XWELL is more attractive than Veracyte.

XWELL has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veracyte has a beta of 2.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.466%.

XWELL has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veracyte offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XWELL pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veracyte pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XWELL quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Veracyte quarterly revenues of $114.5M. XWELL's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Veracyte's net income of $7M. Notably, XWELL's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Veracyte's PE ratio is 65.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XWELL is 0.13x versus 4.60x for Veracyte. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.