WAVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ellomay Capital has a net margin of -313.69% compared to Eco Wave Power Global AB's net margin of 49.49%. Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13% beat Ellomay Capital's return on equity of -2.88%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.9%. On the other hand Ellomay Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -34.64%. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Ellomay Capital, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Ellomay Capital.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.704%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ellomay Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues are $168K, which are smaller than Ellomay Capital quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$499K is lower than Ellomay Capital's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Eco Wave Power Global AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ellomay Capital's PE ratio is 56.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eco Wave Power Global AB is -- versus 5.01x for Ellomay Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enlight Renewable Energy has a net margin of -313.69% compared to Eco Wave Power Global AB's net margin of 86.06%. Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13% beat Enlight Renewable Energy's return on equity of 8.2%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.9%. On the other hand Enlight Renewable Energy has an analysts' consensus of $21.80 which suggests that it could fall by -12.8%. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Enlight Renewable Energy, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Enlight Renewable Energy.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enlight Renewable Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enlight Renewable Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enlight Renewable Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues are $168K, which are smaller than Enlight Renewable Energy quarterly revenues of $109.8M. Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$499K is lower than Enlight Renewable Energy's net income of $94.5M. Notably, Eco Wave Power Global AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enlight Renewable Energy's PE ratio is 25.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eco Wave Power Global AB is -- versus 7.44x for Enlight Renewable Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energix-Renewable Energies has a net margin of -313.69% compared to Eco Wave Power Global AB's net margin of 24.72%. Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13% beat Energix-Renewable Energies's return on equity of 12.95%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.9%. On the other hand Energix-Renewable Energies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Energix-Renewable Energies, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Energix-Renewable Energies.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energix-Renewable Energies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energix-Renewable Energies offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energix-Renewable Energies pays out 97.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Energix-Renewable Energies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues are $168K, which are smaller than Energix-Renewable Energies quarterly revenues of $47M. Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$499K is lower than Energix-Renewable Energies's net income of $11.6M. Notably, Eco Wave Power Global AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energix-Renewable Energies's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eco Wave Power Global AB is -- versus 6.55x for Energix-Renewable Energies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluence Energy has a net margin of -313.69% compared to Eco Wave Power Global AB's net margin of -7.19%. Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of -4.41%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.9%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $7.75 which suggests that it could fall by -5.14%. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues are $168K, which are smaller than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $431.6M. Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$499K is higher than Fluence Energy's net income of -$31M. Notably, Eco Wave Power Global AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 97.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eco Wave Power Global AB is -- versus 0.50x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.