Financhill
Buy
72

TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$210.36
Seasonality move :
0.13%
Day range:
$203.50 - $218.42
52-week range:
$150.01 - $218.42
Dividend yield:
1.06%
P/E ratio:
44.72x
P/S ratio:
13.28x
P/B ratio:
7.85x
Volume:
6M
Avg. volume:
725.5K
1-year change:
29.78%
Market cap:
$96.5B
Revenue:
$7.3B
EPS (TTM):
$4.79

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
TRI
Thomson Reuters
$1.8B $0.84 2.99% -55.04% $185.15
CASS
Cass Information Systems
$51M $0.72 -1.78% 103.13% $50.00
CTAS
Cintas
$2.6B $1.07 6.29% 7.27% $215.63
EVSV
Enviro Serv
-- -- -- -- --
RGP
Resources Connection
$134.5M -$0.01 -9.24% -87.1% $9.67
SGRP
SPAR Group
$39M -- -37.62% -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
TRI
Thomson Reuters
$214.21 $185.15 $96.5B 44.72x $0.60 1.06% 13.28x
CASS
Cass Information Systems
$44.03 $50.00 $588.2M 28.97x $0.31 2.79% 3.22x
CTAS
Cintas
$216.90 $215.63 $87.6B 50.24x $0.39 0.72% 8.79x
EVSV
Enviro Serv
$0.0020 -- $55.4K -- $0.00 0% --
RGP
Resources Connection
$5.45 $9.67 $180.2M 24.22x $0.07 8.99% 0.32x
SGRP
SPAR Group
$0.94 -- $22.1M 2.60x $0.00 0% 0.11x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
TRI
Thomson Reuters
18.62% 0.419 3.61% 0.78x
CASS
Cass Information Systems
-- 0.699 -- 0.82x
CTAS
Cintas
35.04% 1.133 2.96% 0.85x
EVSV
Enviro Serv
-- -0.008 -- --
RGP
Resources Connection
-- 0.957 -- 2.46x
SGRP
SPAR Group
40.87% 1.502 35.09% 1.68x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
TRI
Thomson Reuters
$1.5B $570M 14.56% 18.39% 29.95% $294M
CASS
Cass Information Systems
-- -- 9.04% 9.04% 31.69% $19M
CTAS
Cintas
$1.3B $609.9M 26.01% 41.44% 23.43% $522.1M
EVSV
Enviro Serv
-- -- -- -- -- --
RGP
Resources Connection
$45.4M -$7.7M -29.28% -29.28% -5.94% $238K
SGRP
SPAR Group
$8.4M -$570K 21.7% 33.96% -5.2% -$1M

Thomson Reuters vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or CASS?

    Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 18.95%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 9.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    76.42% $0.96 $15.1B
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems
    -- $0.66 $234.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $185.15, signalling downside risk potential of -13.56%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that Cass Information Systems has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cass Information Systems is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    1 11 3
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is TRI or CASS More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.446, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.44%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 85.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or CASS?

    Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $47.3M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than Cass Information Systems's net income of $9M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.72x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 13.28x versus 3.22x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    13.28x 44.72x $1.9B $434M
    CASS
    Cass Information Systems
    3.22x 28.97x $47.3M $9M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or CTAS?

    Cintas has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 17.76%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    76.42% $0.96 $15.1B
    CTAS
    Cintas
    50.57% $1.13 $7.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $185.15, signalling downside risk potential of -13.56%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $215.63 which suggests that it could fall by -0.59%. Given that Thomson Reuters has more downside risk than Cintas, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    1 11 3
    CTAS
    Cintas
    6 9 2
  • Is TRI or CTAS More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.028%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or CTAS?

    Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.72x while Cintas's PE ratio is 50.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 13.28x versus 8.79x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    13.28x 44.72x $1.9B $434M
    CTAS
    Cintas
    8.79x 50.24x $2.6B $463.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or EVSV?

    Enviro Serv has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    76.42% $0.96 $15.1B
    EVSV
    Enviro Serv
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or EVSV?

    Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $185.15, signalling downside risk potential of -13.56%. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    1 11 3
    EVSV
    Enviro Serv
    0 0 0
  • Is TRI or EVSV More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.409%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or EVSV?

    Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or EVSV?

    Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.72x while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 13.28x versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    13.28x 44.72x $1.9B $434M
    EVSV
    Enviro Serv
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or RGP?

    Resources Connection has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -34.03%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    76.42% $0.96 $15.1B
    RGP
    Resources Connection
    35.06% -$1.34 $277.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $185.15, signalling downside risk potential of -13.56%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 77.37%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    1 11 3
    RGP
    Resources Connection
    1 1 0
  • Is TRI or RGP More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.856%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 8.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or RGP?

    Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.72x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 13.28x versus 0.32x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    13.28x 44.72x $1.9B $434M
    RGP
    Resources Connection
    0.32x 24.22x $129.4M -$44.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns TRI or SGRP?

    SPAR Group has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of -0.38%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    76.42% $0.96 $15.1B
    SGRP
    SPAR Group
    22.34% -$0.01 $49.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $185.15, signalling downside risk potential of -13.56%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 643.26%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    1 11 3
    SGRP
    SPAR Group
    1 0 0
  • Is TRI or SGRP More Risky?

    Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.593%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TRI or SGRP?

    Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.72x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 13.28x versus 0.11x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TRI
    Thomson Reuters
    13.28x 44.72x $1.9B $434M
    SGRP
    SPAR Group
    0.11x 2.60x $37.8M -$144K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?

If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
77
VBTX alert for Jul 15

Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 3.26% over the past day.

Buy
72
MNPR alert for Jul 15

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 8.6% over the past day.

Buy
56
NBIS alert for Jul 15

Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 2.98% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock