STRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delcath Systems has a net margin of -9.1% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 5.4%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -15.99% beat Delcath Systems's return on equity of -40.28%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 340.42%. On the other hand Delcath Systems has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 71.38%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Delcath Systems, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Delcath Systems.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delcath Systems has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.238%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delcath Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays -19.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Delcath Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Delcath Systems quarterly revenues of $19.8M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Delcath Systems's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Delcath Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.11x versus 8.63x for Delcath Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exact Sciences has a net margin of -9.1% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -14.32%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -15.99% beat Exact Sciences's return on equity of -35.57%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 340.42%. On the other hand Exact Sciences has an analysts' consensus of $68.46 which suggests that it could grow by 32.13%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Exact Sciences, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Exact Sciences.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exact Sciences has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.282%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exact Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays -19.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Exact Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Exact Sciences quarterly revenues of $706.8M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Exact Sciences's net income of -$101.2M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Exact Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.11x versus 3.39x for Exact Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illumina has a net margin of -9.1% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 12.58%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -15.99% beat Illumina's return on equity of -34.38%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 340.42%. On the other hand Illumina has an analysts' consensus of $108.88 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Illumina, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Illumina.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illumina has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.43%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Illumina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays -19.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Illumina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Illumina quarterly revenues of $1B. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Illumina's net income of $131M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Illumina's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.11x versus 3.46x for Illumina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natera has a net margin of -9.1% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -13.34%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -15.99% beat Natera's return on equity of -19.19%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 340.42%. On the other hand Natera has an analysts' consensus of $192.78 which suggests that it could grow by 14.64%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Natera, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Natera.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.203% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natera has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.102%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natera offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays -19.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Natera pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Natera quarterly revenues of $501.8M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Natera's net income of -$66.9M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.75x while Natera's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.11x versus 11.77x for Natera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.