SABR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

UiPath has a net margin of -8.22% compared to Sabre's net margin of -3%. Sabre's return on equity of -- beat UiPath's return on equity of -4.78%.

Sabre has a consensus price target of $4.31, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $15.18 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that Sabre has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Sabre is more attractive than UiPath.

Sabre has a beta of 1.799, which suggesting that the stock is 79.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sabre has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sabre pays -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sabre quarterly revenues are $764.7M, which are larger than UiPath quarterly revenues of $354.7M. Sabre's net income of -$62.8M is lower than UiPath's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Sabre's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sabre is 0.48x versus 5.25x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pros Holdings has a net margin of -8.22% compared to Sabre's net margin of 0.28%. Sabre's return on equity of -- beat Pros Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sabre has a consensus price target of $4.31, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Pros Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.81%. Given that Pros Holdings has higher upside potential than Sabre, analysts believe Pros Holdings is more attractive than Sabre.

Sabre has a beta of 1.799, which suggesting that the stock is 79.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pros Holdings has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.585%.

Sabre has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pros Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sabre pays -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Pros Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sabre quarterly revenues are $764.7M, which are larger than Pros Holdings quarterly revenues of $82.7M. Sabre's net income of -$62.8M is lower than Pros Holdings's net income of $235K. Notably, Sabre's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pros Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sabre is 0.48x versus 3.28x for Pros Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -8.22% compared to Sabre's net margin of -2893.73%. Sabre's return on equity of -- beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Sabre has a consensus price target of $4.31, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sabre has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Sabre is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Sabre has a beta of 1.799, which suggesting that the stock is 79.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sabre has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sabre pays -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sabre quarterly revenues are $764.7M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Sabre's net income of -$62.8M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Sabre's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sabre is 0.48x versus 1.62x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -8.22% compared to Sabre's net margin of -1.23%. Sabre's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Sabre has a consensus price target of $4.31, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Sabre, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Sabre.

Sabre has a beta of 1.799, which suggesting that the stock is 79.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

Sabre has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sabre pays -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sabre quarterly revenues are $764.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Sabre's net income of -$62.8M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Sabre's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sabre is 0.48x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.