RPAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of -9.14%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.41, signalling upside risk potential of 46.46%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 141.24%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Repay Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Repay Holdings.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.492% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 2.37x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Atleos has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 2.23%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53% beat NCR Atleos's return on equity of -12.83%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.41, signalling upside risk potential of 46.46%. On the other hand NCR Atleos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than NCR Atleos, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than NCR Atleos.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.492% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Atleos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Atleos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Atleos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are smaller than NCR Atleos quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than NCR Atleos's net income of $24M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NCR Atleos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 2.37x versus 0.58x for NCR Atleos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Priority Technology Holdings has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 4.67%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53% beat Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.41, signalling upside risk potential of 46.46%. On the other hand Priority Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.65%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.492% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.668%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Priority Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Priority Technology Holdings pays out -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are smaller than Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of $227M. Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Priority Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 2.37x versus 1.00x for Priority Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Block has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 4.75%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53% beat Block's return on equity of 5.56%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.41, signalling upside risk potential of 46.46%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $97.06 which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Block.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.492% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.791%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $79.1M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Block's net income of $283.8M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Block's PE ratio is 54.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 2.37x versus 2.42x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.