RDI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of -10.1%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -60.86%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.26%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.39%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Reading International, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Reading International.

Reading International has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.243%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are larger than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Cineverse's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 1.28x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of -5.38%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Gaia's return on equity of -6.96%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.26%. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 79.49%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Reading International, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Reading International.

Reading International has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are larger than Gaia quarterly revenues of $22.2M. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Gaia's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 1.22x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 24.06%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.26%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $837.88 which suggests that it could fall by -9.33%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Netflix.

Reading International has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.982%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 52.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 10.84x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -11.51% compared to Reading International's net margin of 0.02%. Reading International's return on equity of -195.8% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $1.70, signalling upside risk potential of 37.26%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Reading International has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.201%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $60.1M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Reading International's net income of -$6.9M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.