QNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway has a net margin of 1.64% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of 3.61%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -0.3% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $25.25, signalling upside risk potential of 62.28%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Lendway.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.885%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $269.8M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. QuinStreet's net income of $4.4M is higher than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 0.85x versus 0.22x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of 1.64% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of -6.19%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -0.3% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $25.25, signalling upside risk potential of 62.28%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $22.72 which suggests that it could fall by -1.67%. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Magnite.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.224%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $269.8M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. QuinStreet's net income of $4.4M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite's PE ratio is 115.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 0.85x versus 5.11x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Specificity has a net margin of 1.64% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of --. QuinStreet's return on equity of -0.3% beat Specificity's return on equity of --.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $25.25, signalling upside risk potential of 62.28%. On the other hand Specificity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Specificity, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Specificity.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Specificity has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Specificity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Specificity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $269.8M, which are larger than Specificity quarterly revenues of --. QuinStreet's net income of $4.4M is higher than Specificity's net income of --. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Specificity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 0.85x versus 8.06x for Specificity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of 1.64% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of 7.38%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -0.3% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $25.25, signalling upside risk potential of 62.28%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.91%. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Ziff Davis.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.999%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $269.8M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. QuinStreet's net income of $4.4M is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 19.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 0.85x versus 1.04x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.