PRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings has a net margin of -137.21% compared to Prenetics Global's net margin of --. Prenetics Global's return on equity of -23.16% beat Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

Prenetics Global has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 141.29%. On the other hand Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prenetics Global has higher upside potential than Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings, analysts believe Prenetics Global is more attractive than Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings.

Prenetics Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prenetics Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prenetics Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prenetics Global quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are larger than Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Prenetics Global's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Prenetics Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings's PE ratio is 5.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prenetics Global is 2.20x versus 0.47x for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regencell Bioscience Holdings has a net margin of -137.21% compared to Prenetics Global's net margin of --. Prenetics Global's return on equity of -23.16% beat Regencell Bioscience Holdings's return on equity of --.

Prenetics Global has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 141.29%. On the other hand Regencell Bioscience Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prenetics Global has higher upside potential than Regencell Bioscience Holdings, analysts believe Prenetics Global is more attractive than Regencell Bioscience Holdings.

Prenetics Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regencell Bioscience Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prenetics Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regencell Bioscience Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prenetics Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regencell Bioscience Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prenetics Global quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are larger than Regencell Bioscience Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Prenetics Global's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Regencell Bioscience Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Prenetics Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regencell Bioscience Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prenetics Global is 2.20x versus -- for Regencell Bioscience Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sino Biopharmaceutical has a net margin of -137.21% compared to Prenetics Global's net margin of --. Prenetics Global's return on equity of -23.16% beat Sino Biopharmaceutical's return on equity of 8.57%.

Prenetics Global has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 141.29%. On the other hand Sino Biopharmaceutical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prenetics Global has higher upside potential than Sino Biopharmaceutical, analysts believe Prenetics Global is more attractive than Sino Biopharmaceutical.

Prenetics Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Biopharmaceutical has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.441%.

Prenetics Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sino Biopharmaceutical offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prenetics Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Biopharmaceutical pays out 52.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Biopharmaceutical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prenetics Global quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are larger than Sino Biopharmaceutical quarterly revenues of --. Prenetics Global's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Sino Biopharmaceutical's net income of --. Notably, Prenetics Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sino Biopharmaceutical's PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prenetics Global is 2.20x versus 2.25x for Sino Biopharmaceutical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uni-Bio Science Group has a net margin of -137.21% compared to Prenetics Global's net margin of --. Prenetics Global's return on equity of -23.16% beat Uni-Bio Science Group's return on equity of --.

Prenetics Global has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 141.29%. On the other hand Uni-Bio Science Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prenetics Global has higher upside potential than Uni-Bio Science Group, analysts believe Prenetics Global is more attractive than Uni-Bio Science Group.

Prenetics Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uni-Bio Science Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prenetics Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uni-Bio Science Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prenetics Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uni-Bio Science Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prenetics Global quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are larger than Uni-Bio Science Group quarterly revenues of --. Prenetics Global's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Uni-Bio Science Group's net income of --. Notably, Prenetics Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uni-Bio Science Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prenetics Global is 2.20x versus -- for Uni-Bio Science Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.