PPBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of -5.41%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of 5.03% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 0.58%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $25.70, signalling upside risk potential of 22.03%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Premier Bancorp has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe Pacific Premier Bancorp is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.734%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.27%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 80.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out 81.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $131.2M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of -$451K. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 173.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 3.69x versus 1.87x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of -64.55%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of 5.03% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity of -37.37%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $25.70, signalling upside risk potential of 22.03%. On the other hand Carver Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17599.11%. Given that Carver Bancorp has higher upside potential than Pacific Premier Bancorp, analysts believe Carver Bancorp is more attractive than Pacific Premier Bancorp.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.908%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.27%. Carver Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 80.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Premier Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $131.2M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is higher than Carver Bancorp's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Carver Bancorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 3.69x versus 0.39x for Carver Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 34.03%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of 5.03% beat Pathward Financial's return on equity of 22.91%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $25.70, signalling upside risk potential of 22.03%. On the other hand Pathward Financial has an analysts' consensus of $90.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.15%. Given that Pacific Premier Bancorp has higher upside potential than Pathward Financial, analysts believe Pacific Premier Bancorp is more attractive than Pathward Financial.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.316%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.27%. Pathward Financial offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 80.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $131.2M, which are smaller than Pathward Financial quarterly revenues of $218.2M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is lower than Pathward Financial's net income of $74.3M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Pathward Financial's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 3.69x versus 3.18x for Pathward Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbia Banking System has a net margin of 27.47% compared to Pacific Premier Bancorp's net margin of 17.63%. Pacific Premier Bancorp's return on equity of 5.03% beat Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.71%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a consensus price target of $25.70, signalling upside risk potential of 22.03%. On the other hand Columbia Banking System has an analysts' consensus of $27.21 which suggests that it could grow by 16.62%. Given that Pacific Premier Bancorp has higher upside potential than Columbia Banking System, analysts believe Pacific Premier Bancorp is more attractive than Columbia Banking System.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.591%.

Pacific Premier Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.27%. Columbia Banking System offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Pacific Premier Bancorp pays 80.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Banking System pays out 56.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pacific Premier Bancorp quarterly revenues are $131.2M, which are smaller than Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues of $491.4M. Pacific Premier Bancorp's net income of $36M is lower than Columbia Banking System's net income of $86.6M. Notably, Pacific Premier Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.86x while Columbia Banking System's PE ratio is 9.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Premier Bancorp is 3.69x versus 2.51x for Columbia Banking System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.